If US/UK Think Saddam Had WoMD, They Should Torture Him..

[Solly]

Assuming weapons of mass destruction are known to exist by our governments, then surely the torture of one man (a brutal, murderous dictator at that), to discover the whereabouts of them, is a far more pleasant solution to the problem than leaving the weapons to fall into the wrong hands - a situation that could lead to the deaths of many people a whole lot more innocent than Hussein.

Agree or disagree?

[Spiffor]

If I think you had WoMD's I should be able to torture you.
Should your Wommdies fall in the wrong hands, the world would be a much more sorry place, so I think it's worth taking the risk of torturing you.

[Cruddy]

Disagree.

Torture does not lead to accurate information.

Psychological deprogramming is much more effective.

In Saddam's case, I think either is a waste of time - how do you tell when he's lying?

[Spec]

Disagree. There are no WOMD. It was an excuse to invade Iraq. Thought you'd know by now.

And seemingly, everyone forgot about Osama, the man they should REALLY be looking for. Let me remind you that he is the one that hit the WTC, not Saddam.

Spec.

[dannubis]

and becomming exactely what you set out to destroy ?
how amusing ...

[Mazarin]

The fact that torture should be banned from our socities is one of the core human rights achievements of democraties. Throwing this away is simply not justified by any "benefit" we could gain. This is the same reason why I strongly object to giving Saddam the capital punishment.

[Conqueror]

With your logic, Park, we should torture Bush / Blair / Putin too, they have a lot of WoMD's.

[lord of the mark]

Originally posted by Spec
Disagree. There are no WOMD. It was an excuse to invade Iraq. Thought you'd know by now.

And seemingly, everyone forgot about Osama, the man they should REALLY be looking for. Let me remind you that he is the one that hit the WTC, not Saddam.

Spec.

No ones forgotten about him - the search goes on (though theres a significant probability hes dead)

[TCO]

Originally posted by Spec
Disagree. There are no WOMD. It was an excuse to invade Iraq. Thought you'd know by now.

And seemingly, everyone forgot about Osama, the man they should REALLY be looking for. Let me remind you that he is the one that hit the WTC, not Saddam.

Spec.

I guess you missed the invasion of Afghanistan, which started 3 weeks after the WTC. And was succesful. You worm.

[Japher]

how do you tell when he's lying?

His lips are moving?

And seemingly, everyone forgot about Osama, the man they should REALLY be looking for. Let me remind you that he is the one that hit the WTC, not Saddam.

It's very hard to catch someone who is being sheltered and aided by such criminals as Saddam... Now that he's out of the picture thoug... things that make you go

[lord of the mark]

Originally posted by Japher


His lips are moving?




It's very hard to catch someone who is being sheltered and aided by such criminals as Saddam... Now that he's out of the picture thoug... things that make you go

You think Saddam was sheltering the scraps of protein in Tora Bora?

[MrBaggins]

If US/UK Think Saddam was a Megalomaniac Thug They Should Torture Him..

Just for the irony of it. Actually... I'd prefer that it wasn't the US/UK doing the torture, but the surviving victims of his regimes torture.

I don't condone NC torture, but this guy is begging to be made an example of.

[KrazyHorse]

Originally posted by TCO


I guess you missed the invasion of Afghanistan, which started 3 weeks after the WTC. And was succesful. You worm.

Worm was better when it was reserved for people expressing wormlike sentiments. Now you should just add it as your sig...

[KrazyHorse]

Originally posted by Japher
It's very hard to catch someone who is being sheltered and aided by such criminals as Saddam... Now that he's out of the picture thoug... things that make you go

So according to you Osama Bin Laddie was in Iraq?

Wow...

[Pekka]

Disagree. Can easily lead to false information.