Originally posted by Chemical Ollie
I second MOBIUS on at least one point - the Brits in Basra must be doing something right. I presume the "experts" will give me the typical explaination - Basra is a friendly territory! But what is the hen and what is the egg? Why is Basra friendly?
The Brits have learned peacekeeping operations the hard way, in Belfast, Cyprus and Bosnia. You can't win a liberation war without the support of the civilians. I don't think the "friendlieness" of Basra is the only explaination to the success of the Brits. There are guerilla assaults there too. But you never hear of Brits killing journalists or allies, and hardly ever civilians either (but that happened, I know). I think a good idea to win this war might be for the Yanks to learn from the Tommie's tactics - whatever that is.
I second MOBIUS on at least one point - the Brits in Basra must be doing something right. I presume the "experts" will give me the typical explaination - Basra is a friendly territory! But what is the hen and what is the egg? Why is Basra friendly?
The Brits have learned peacekeeping operations the hard way, in Belfast, Cyprus and Bosnia. You can't win a liberation war without the support of the civilians. I don't think the "friendlieness" of Basra is the only explaination to the success of the Brits. There are guerilla assaults there too. But you never hear of Brits killing journalists or allies, and hardly ever civilians either (but that happened, I know). I think a good idea to win this war might be for the Yanks to learn from the Tommie's tactics - whatever that is.
Ollie: You have apoint but you ignore the fact that nearly all of Saddam's supporters are Sunni while the south's population is almost entirely made up of anti-Saddam Shiites. Of course we will have more problems from Saddam's supporters then from people who wanted Saddam over thrown.
Comment