Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What makes a movie bad?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What makes a movie bad?

    Asmodean just started a thread on stupid movies.
    http://apolyton.net/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=101829
    But the thread brought up an interesting point - why makes a movie truly bad - not just in your opinion, but in general.

    Some thoughts.

    1) Judge it relative to the genre. If you judge a "feel good" movie ("You've got mail") by the standards of a serious movie, then you are doing the movie, and yourself, a disservice. The movie, because that's unfair. Yourself, because you limit yourself, and will find it less likely to get friends to go to movies with you (he always says movies I like are dumb, I'm not even going to bother to call him ).

    Certain movies are tough. Was "Alien" SF or horror? Actually, it may have been part of a budding subgenre, SF horror. Don't laugh, if you look carefully at a well-stocked video store, there are actually quite a few. As a straight SF film, it's dumb. As a horror film in an SF setting, it works. It would help, though, if I liked horror films. See below.

    2) Admit if you just generally hate the genre. That way you can avoid it, and negotiations about which movies to watch with friends and significant others go MUCH better. I cannot abide "Dumb and dumber" style movies. My wife goes with friends when she wants to catch one. I go with friends for military flicks.

    3) Make sure you are in the right mood for the genre/movie. I admire "Grave of the Fireflies". I would only watch it when I am in the mood for a serious movie (plus, I would NEVER watch it after a week of cold, wet weather when I'm feeling down ). On a light fare day it would be a disaster!

    Let's try looking at all time bad movies in their genre.

    1) Crow 2 & 3. I believe Ebert liked the first movie, and his reasons coincide with mine. It was an atmosphere and cinematography type film, you had to suspend disbelief. Crow 2 and 3 had all the problems of the genre, with none of the advantages. Bad for the genre, bad films.

    2) Star Wars 1 & 2. Space opera gone bad. Especially the first one. How did Jar-Jar Binks ever make it into the final movie? Need I say anything more.

    3) Certain Star Trek movies. I can't keep the numbers straight. Some were keepers, some weren't, I leave it for a Trekkie to post the right numbers.

    4) Ishtar. Except which genre does it fit in? Does it make a difference.

    5) Thumbilena - incredibly bad children's movie from the early 90's. Bad examples for kids, mediocre animation, etc. It even bores many kids, at least those who won't just watch anything put in front of them, to tears.

    6) Pochohantas (Disney) - bad history, weak animation, lousy writing. The direct to video sequal was better.


    Any thoughts on bad, vs. stupid, movies? (please note, plenty of overlap) .
    The worst form of insubordination is being right - Keith D., marine veteran. A dictator will starve to the last civilian - self-quoted
    And on the eigth day, God realized it was Monday, and created caffeine. And behold, it was very good. - self-quoted
    Klaatu: I'm impatient with stupidity. My people have learned to live without it.
    Mr. Harley: I'm afraid my people haven't. I'm very sorry… I wish it were otherwise.

  • #2
    What makes a film bad?

    Is it based on a computer game?

    (Super Mario, Mortal Kombat, yada, yada, yada)

    Will it require colourful Oirish characters to do jigs, sing and say begorrah, and at all costs not be played by Irish actors? (Titanic, Far and Away, The Devil's Own, that crappy one with Jeff Bridges and Tommy Lee Jones as an incendiarist/bomber, Day of the Jackal MK. II, Finians Rainbow, Ryan's Daughter, Patriot Games, et al.)

    Is it a sequel? Or worse, part three of a series?

    Godfather III, Alien III, Police Academy III, and so on.

    Is it a pointless irritating remake of far better classier film, or a retread of a witty amusing French/Italian/Chinese/Indian/Inuit original?

    Get Carter MK.II (Sylvester Stallone? Were they mad? Is he?) Day of the Jackal MK.II, Assassin (here's a hint guys, it has two asses in the title), Three Men and a Baby, Green Card, The Birdcage, Grease II: The Sump Oil, the list is growing yearly.

    Does it have Uma Thurman or Andie McDowell in speaking roles? (with the exception of Short Cuts)?

    Does it have Nathan Lane in a role requiring consciousness?

    Is it a vanity project for a singer/model/ex cocaine mule for the Colombian druglords?

    'Glitter', any Kylie Minogue film, nearly all Sting's films, some of David Bowie's, Mick Jagger's 'Ned Kelly', 'Can't Stop the Music', 'Xanadu' Slade in 'Flame', Vanilla Ice's schlock, again, the list of debacles grows apace.

    Is the film advertised as having a great soundtrack?

    (The Mod Squad, Peter's Friends, containing the worst portrayal of a person meant to be drunk by a Shakespearean actor)

    These are all some tips for identifying cinematic cack-ola and crappy doodoo of the highest order.
    Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

    ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

    Comment


    • #3
      Does it feature anyone who was ever, or will ever grow up to be a politician, even of the lowest order? (fill in your own Republican/Democrat, etc. gag here)

      Is acting the main job of the "stars"?

      Is the whole sorry charade just an excuse to sell some crappy children's toys/any kind of merchandising?

      Do the press talk about who was at the premiere, rather than what they were there to see?

      Comment


      • #4
        Are boobs and ass more imposing than the story itself? (Charlies angels for example)

        Does Ebert give it 2 thumbs up?

        Does Jean Claude Van Damme play in the movie?

        Is the story based on a natural disaster?

        Spec.
        -Never argue with an idiot; He will bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.

        Comment


        • #5
          van Damme or Seagel (something like that)

          Was the movie made specifically to try to win an Oscar?

          Is the story a natural disaster?

          All "spoof" flicks (okay, most "spoof" flicks)
          (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
          (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
          (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by molly bloom
            What makes a film bad?

            Does it have Uma Thurman or Andie McDowell in speaking roles? (with the exception of Short Cuts)?
            Kill Bill was great.
            I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
            For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

            Comment


            • #7
              Is Roland Emmerich the director?

              Is Jennifer Lopez starring?

              Is Angelina Jolie starring?

              Is Paul Verhoeven trying to do Sci-fi?

              Is Mel Gibson dealing with the English?

              Is Richard Gere dealing with the Chinese?

              Comment


              • #8
                Does the same actor play both twins?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Is it made from a Stephen King novel?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Are boobs and ass more imposing than the story itself? (Charlies angels for example)
                    Bah, you can't judge a movie like that, it succeaded admirably in what it set out to do (haven't seen the sequel).

                    How about "released after a major participant in its making has died" ie Queen of the Damned, Eyes Wide Shut, etc.
                    Stop Quoting Ben

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Urban Ranger
                      van Damme or Seagel (something like that)

                      Was the movie made specifically to try to win an Oscar?

                      Is the story a natural disaster?

                      All "spoof" flicks (okay, most "spoof" flicks)
                      Dude, you repeated exactly what I said!




                      Spec.
                      -Never argue with an idiot; He will bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        No one really reads your posts, Spec

                        Bad actors, genres, stories don't always make a bad movie. If you think because some idiot wrote the film, or some bad actor is in it, or because you don't like a certain type of move, then it is bad, then you are being and idiot

                        Bad movies are bad only if produced by Jerry Bruckheimer and directed by Michael BaY!

                        Seriously, bad movies are bad if there are serious plot holes, character development is poor, or if the movie ends and you find yourself wondering why you wasted $7.50 and 2 hours.

                        Crow 2&3 were bad, not because of the genre but because they were mere reshots of the first one with worse plots and no point, not to mention in your face imagry.

                        Ishtar sucked because the movie had not point.

                        Star Wars 1&2 sucked because of poor character development and gaping plot wholes that made no freakin' sense.

                        Most action flicks suck, but then you go to these for special effects and not for great acting or intriguing plots.

                        Most of what is needed in a movie is tough to include. Many of the bad writters put so much into their scripts that when the movie hits pre-editing half of what is needed to make it good ends up on the floor because no one wants to watch a 4 hour alright movie.
                        Monkey!!!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          "Updates" of classic films, especially the one where they reshot Psycho frame for frame. It might have been quite clever and subversive if they'd tried to make it even a little bit different - but it was exactly the same! Though strangely, not a patch on the original.

                          I am struggling to find a decent "odd couple" film - not Matthau & Lemon, but one with a fat white woman and a black model, good cop/cop of different ethnic persuasion, etc.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I much prefer general principles to wishy-washy genre-specific ones. Like good music all good movies have stuff in common I think, some of which is extendible to all expression more or less.

                            E.g. Does it show intent? Have the ideas of the director been carried through effectively or is it indistictly directed? Has the director been able to control the way the film feels or does it seem really haphazard?

                            Does the film use the medium as well as it can? Or, alternatively, is it "stagey" and the reason it's actually been filmed is unclear? Is thestory/idea actually suited for filming at all? Does it have cinematography that contributes something meaningful to the film? Scenery? Costumes? Lighting? Is the pacing well executed or does it drag?

                            Is the film sufficiently complex? Does it have hidden depths in the script, the direction, the acting, the look, the cinematography, etc.? Is it intense? Or is there loads of extraneous stuff that ought to have been scaled away? Is it emotionally and energetically intense? Is it unified? Or do parts fit badly together? Does the way the story is told seem unbalanced?

                            Does the story hang together? Are the ideas, thematic, philosophical or otherwise, carried through successfully? Or is the plot lost, do some parts "break" the central idea?

                            Is the film original? Does it add new things to the world of cinema? Does it bring forth new ideas in some way?
                            Världsstad - Dom lokala genrenas vän
                            Mick102, 102,3 Umeå, Måndagar 20-21

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Whoo! Threadkill!
                              Världsstad - Dom lokala genrenas vän
                              Mick102, 102,3 Umeå, Måndagar 20-21

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X