Compensation is irrelevant if the confiscation is involuntary.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
15 years for owning a gun
Collapse
X
-
Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/
-
Boris -DF didn't make any caveat for threats justifying confiscation. He said he couldn't think of ANY circumstance.
What's the difference? Perhaps he hauled them by truck across the border himself. Let's say he obtained all parts through purchase of willing suppliers.
And since most property used for transportation is "public", he would need the public's permission. I suggest you remove the threat aspect of your scenario, it isn't needed and just convolutes the point you're trying to make.
Comment
Comment