Tweet
I'd buy it.
-
Exult in your existence, because that very process has blundered unwittingly on its own negation. Only a small, local negation, to be sure: only one species, and only a minority of that species; but there lies hope. [...] Stand tall, Bipedal Ape. The shark may outswim you, the cheetah outrun you, the swift outfly you, the capuchin outclimb you, the elephant outpower you, the redwood outlast you. But you have the biggest gifts of all: the gift of understanding the ruthlessly cruel process that gave us all existence [and the] gift of revulsion against its implications.
-Richard Dawkins -
That involves paying for the birth control.Originally posted by Q Cubed
actually, i think if everybody in the world had sex more, we'd have a lot less conflict.
...
so all we have to do to fix a country is make it so they don't have babies by do have lots and lots of sex.
Iron is a problem. There's such a world glut of it that even the US, "bastion of free trade", has to subsidise it's producers.
Personally, I'd be very careful about bringing the oil onstream. Tourism, while less lucrative, is less destructive and more long term. It's also more labour intensive (which is maybe what you don't need with 3 million people)...
Good thread Azazel.Some cry `Allah O Akbar` in the street. And some carry Allah in their heart.
"The CIA does nothing, says nothing, allows nothing, unless its own interests are served. They are the biggest assembly of liars and theives this country ever put under one roof and they are an abomination" Deputy COS (Intel) US Army 1981-84Comment
-
That involves paying for the birth control.
who cares about birth control if we irradiate everyone?
i still say antarctica. i'm sure there are plenty of resources there we haven't found yet.B♭3Comment
Comment