Lots of scientific references for the lazy
Gender Differences in Cognitive Functioning: a Literature Review
Toni Bush (Pacific Sports Entertainment)
Introduction
Several studies have examined differences in cognitive functioning between the genders (Eagly, 1978; Wright, 1975; and Darley & Smith, 1995). Each has presented a different definition of cognitive functioning, which has made comparison between studies difficult. For example, Eagly (1978) cites the ability to be influenced, and the ability to conform as factors of cognitive functioning. In contrast, Wright (1975) makes reference to females' general self confidence, information processing confidence, and topical opinion leader ability as cognitive responses. Additionally, there are several studies which define cognitive functioning as the ability to perform cognitive processing tasks (Burstein, Bank, & Jarvik, 1980; Meyers-Levy, 1989; McGuiness & Pribram, 1979; and Darley & Smith, 1995).
Due to this definitional difficulty it has been argued that no real difference in cognitive functioning exists between the genders (Block, 1976). A stable definition of cognitive functioning needs, therefore, to be established in order to ascertain any differences in cognitive functioning between males and females. In this paper, the definition of cognitive functioning which is used will be "the process whereby the capacity to make accurate categorisations is met with the ability to evaluate outcomes or make accurate decisions" (McGuiness & Pribram, 1979, p.38).
This definition concurs with several recent studies of the way males and females process information. the majority of this literature supports the concept that males and females differ in the strategies they use to process information. Known as the selectivity model, it is hypothesised that males are selective processors while females are more likely to engage in a comprehensive processing strategy (Meyers-Levy, 1989). This paper examines the evidence for gender differences in cognitive functioning and discusses some explanations of the causes of any such differences.
Gender Differences in Cognitive Functioning: a Literature Review
Toni Bush (Pacific Sports Entertainment)
Introduction
Several studies have examined differences in cognitive functioning between the genders (Eagly, 1978; Wright, 1975; and Darley & Smith, 1995). Each has presented a different definition of cognitive functioning, which has made comparison between studies difficult. For example, Eagly (1978) cites the ability to be influenced, and the ability to conform as factors of cognitive functioning. In contrast, Wright (1975) makes reference to females' general self confidence, information processing confidence, and topical opinion leader ability as cognitive responses. Additionally, there are several studies which define cognitive functioning as the ability to perform cognitive processing tasks (Burstein, Bank, & Jarvik, 1980; Meyers-Levy, 1989; McGuiness & Pribram, 1979; and Darley & Smith, 1995).
Due to this definitional difficulty it has been argued that no real difference in cognitive functioning exists between the genders (Block, 1976). A stable definition of cognitive functioning needs, therefore, to be established in order to ascertain any differences in cognitive functioning between males and females. In this paper, the definition of cognitive functioning which is used will be "the process whereby the capacity to make accurate categorisations is met with the ability to evaluate outcomes or make accurate decisions" (McGuiness & Pribram, 1979, p.38).
This definition concurs with several recent studies of the way males and females process information. the majority of this literature supports the concept that males and females differ in the strategies they use to process information. Known as the selectivity model, it is hypothesised that males are selective processors while females are more likely to engage in a comprehensive processing strategy (Meyers-Levy, 1989). This paper examines the evidence for gender differences in cognitive functioning and discusses some explanations of the causes of any such differences.
Comment