I'm curious . . . . .

[Ming]

Originally posted by MrFun
DOH!!!!

Fixed... an yes, this has been done many times before.

The problem is how "black and white" the choices are.

I supported Bush because I couldn't stand Gore... The lesser of two evils in my opinion. And while I don't agree with some of Bush's actions (well, many), I still like him better than any of the current Democrats at the moment, so would probably vote for him again. But that doesn't mean I support all of what he has done... just that I don't trust the Bozo the Dems will probably put up If they come up with somebody good....

[Dis]

Wesley Clark might be good

though he doesn't have much political experience.

But what California proved is you don't need a leader who has political experience

[SlowwHand]

Dissident, you need to stay out of the sun.., son.
Yo head be fryin'.

[Nubclear]

Hmm...I wonder what would happen if I took, say, France in Enlightenment age...Declared war on two small countries, and sent a warning to everyone else.

Anyway, i still do not support Bush. I never have, and probably never will.

[chequita guevara]

You missed the choice of, never liked him, now I hate him. At first I thought he was just your run-of-the-mill corporate whore Repug, but with the stomping on political liberties, the secretiveness, and the war mongering, it's clear he's an exceptionally bad President. He may not be the worst President we've ever had, but he's sure trying to be.

[Q Classic]

ah. thanks for reminding me, diss.

i could have done without remembering that this administration, as well as all the other ones in recent memory, really care for their progeny.

you know, by running up the bills, having a grand old party, and then sticking us with the goddamned check.

f*cking politicians.

[St Leo]

Nader.

[Sikander]

Originally posted by Sandman
In Europa Universalis terms, I'd give Bush 3 for warfare, 2 for adminstration and 1 for diplomacy.

That sounds about right. Too bad he isn't a warrior king, we could send him to assault Cyprus or something.

[Sikander]

Originally posted by Dissident
......
Also why is Condoleeza Rice running the whole Iraq show right now? It seems strange that the NSA has so much power. It seems as if Powell and Rumsfeld are being pushed out of the way. In fact rumours are Rumsfeld is set up to take the fall for Iraq. I doubt Rumsfeld will be back next term. And we already know Powell is leaving after this term.

something very strange going on in that administration. I don't like it.

Condi is National Security Advisor, and a member of the National Security Council. She doesn't run the National Security Agency, which is always headed by a three star military person.

[Sikander]

I voted Libertarian as usual. I thought both of the major party candidates were a$smunches, but preferred Bush to what's his name. Bush has been a big dissappointment though, even considering the mediocrity I had been led to believe his administration would be. The one area where they seemed strong has turned out to be their Achilles heel, namely defense and foreign policy. The tax cut was nice, but the insance spending levels that the congress has been maintaining since Clinton's second term are going to mean either a huge long term drain on the economy, or taxes are going to head north again. Neither prospect is appealling.

[Zkribbler]

I still think that Bradley and McCain were the best men for the job.

[chequita guevara]

Originally posted by Sandman
In Europa Universalis terms, I'd give Bush 3 for warfare, 2 for adminstration and 1 for diplomacy.

You're being generous. 1 Administration, 0 Diplomacy, but I would up his military to four or five, since he increased spending.

Is it possible to do an war anti-tax?

[mrmitchell]

I was just not going to vote, but I figured after Sloww made it into a race I would vote

Always against Bush, and more against every day. The man is a menace to the world.

[MrFun]

Originally posted by Ming


Fixed... an yes, this has been done many times before.

The problem is how "black and white" the choices are.

I supported Bush because I couldn't stand Gore... The lesser of two evils in my opinion. And while I don't agree with some of Bush's actions (well, many), I still like him better than any of the current Democrats at the moment, so would probably vote for him again. But that doesn't mean I support all of what he has done... just that I don't trust the Bozo the Dems will probably put up If they come up with somebody good....

Well, at least give credit for being Mr. Good Doer for not starting this thread as a dumb troll.

[Ming]

Dumb.... Nahhhh... troll.... maybe