Is profit different from unfair tax?

[Kidlicious]

No.

The US was founded on a revolution against unfair taxation. Anger over unfair taxes is part of our national identity. Working people who know very little about economics and politcs find it so easy to critisize the government because of what they percieve as unfair taxes. It's easy to see how taxes hurt you because they come out of your check or you have to pay them directly. Why can't more working people see that profit, rent and interest comes out of their pay too?

[Dinner]

So you perpose that people not make any profits for the services they perform?

[Dis]

communists are dum

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Oerdin


So you perpose that people not make any profits for the services they perform?

If you perform a service than you are paid a wage or salary. That's not profit.

[SlowwHand]

Yes, and it's a dumb question.

[mrmitchell]

I don't get your point, Kid.

Companies who have more profit should pay their employees more not only to be fair, but to attract even more better employees (and as an incentive for the good work they've obviously been doing).

But it's up to them, of course, where the new money is redistributed. It can go to top executives, it can go to the workers, or it can build huge reserves in banks so that it can pull it all out and cause financial meltdown later. ...

[Q Classic]

profit is different from an unfair tax.

why? because an unfair tax goes to enrich the government, while profit goes to enrich the person paid.

if anything, it's more like a kickback or bribe--both of which would be endemic in any stalinist/communist system devised thus far.

[mrmitchell]

If you perform a service than you are paid a wage or salary. That's not profit.

The equation:

Value of service = v
Pay for service = p
Profit = m

p-v=m

If a grocery store pays $40/hour to baggers, then does that mean the baggers aren't at least in everything but terminology earning a "profit"?

[SlowwHand]

Have to remember, it's a person who is enthusiastic over the antiquated concept of communism that asks such a question.

[Arrian]

[Japher]

mrmitchell you are looking at it from only one side of the ledger.

From the owner of the grocery store the bagger is getting paid for the value of the service as is the checker. Besides, the owner pays the bagger only from it's profit side while for the bagger what he sees it as is earnings.

Unfortunately, everytime money is exchanged there is tax. The grocer is taxed on supplying the service, the buyer taxed on the money they earned plus for par-taking in the service offered, the grocer is again taxed for the buyer partaking in the service, and then taxed again for paying his employees, who are also taxed for making money so that they can be a buyer... It's a vicious loop that has the government seeing money all the time... This is why the buyer can write-off a lot of this as expenses.

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by Q Cubed
profit is different from an unfair tax.

why? because an unfair tax goes to enrich the government, while profit goes to enrich the person paid.

if anything, it's more like a kickback or bribe--both of which would be endemic in any stalinist/communist system devised thus far.

Why would you want to enrich the capitalist, but not the govt? I don't want to enrich either one. I want all of what I earn.

[Q Classic]

yeah, 'cept that in a socialist/communist government, to prevent yourself from being ratted on by the neighbor, or to ensure that the wheels of justice turn in your favor, you have to pay, er, bribe the lawyer/policeman. it's a profit for them, mostly 'cause they don't have to do much other than look the other way.

[Kidlicious]

Originally posted by mrmitchell

The equation:

Value of service = v
Pay for service = p
Profit = m

p-v=m

And the question is that if the value of your service is v, then why aren't you mad because you only get paid p.

[rah]

Ok, now we have something that might actually be worthy of discussion.

Which form of government requires the most "GREASE" to be effective?