Two points. A redesign would only be necessary if the patent holder does not license Microsoft or anyone else to use the patent.
That seems highly unlikely.
Second, I have always thought that patents were the best way to allow independent software companies to develop their products and protect their innovations from being stolen by Microsoft. I assume, but do not know, that the present case is one such case where Microsoft stole the ideas developed by a small software developer. If this is the case, the present patent case represents a real plus because it gives the small guy hope that he can get justice.
I think Che, the commie, is on the wrong side of this issue. He should be on the side of the worker against the mammoth corporation.
That seems highly unlikely.
Second, I have always thought that patents were the best way to allow independent software companies to develop their products and protect their innovations from being stolen by Microsoft. I assume, but do not know, that the present case is one such case where Microsoft stole the ideas developed by a small software developer. If this is the case, the present patent case represents a real plus because it gives the small guy hope that he can get justice.
I think Che, the commie, is on the wrong side of this issue. He should be on the side of the worker against the mammoth corporation.
Comment