Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Do any of the military types here have a problem with this?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Do any of the military types here have a problem with this?

    U.S. troops using confiscated Iraqi AK-47s
    By Andrew England, Associated Press, 8/24/2003 14:00

    BAQOUBA, Iraq (AP) An American soldier stands at the side of an Iraqi highway, puts his AK-47 on fully automatic and pulls the trigger.

    Within seconds the assault rifle has blasted out 30 rounds. Puffs of dust dance in the air as the bullets smack into the scrubland dirt. Test fire complete.

    U.S. troops in Iraq may not have found weapons of mass destruction, but they're certainly getting their hands on the country's stock of Kalashnikovs and, they say, they need them.

    The soldiers based around Baqouba are from an armor battalion, which means they have tanks, Humvees and armored personnel carriers. But they are short on rifles.

    A four-man tank crew is issued two M4 assault rifles and four 9mm pistols, relying mostly on the tank's firepower for protection.

    But now they are engaged in guerrilla warfare, patrolling narrow roads and goat trails where tanks are less effective. Troops often find themselves dismounting to patrol in smaller vehicles, making rifles essential.

    ''We just do not have enough rifles to equip all of our soldiers. So in certain circumstances we allow soldiers to have an AK-47. They have to demonstrate some proficiency with the weapon ... demonstrate an ability to use it,'' said Lt. Col. Mark Young, commander of the 3rd Battalion, 67th Armor Regiment, 4th Infantry Division.

    ''Normally an armor battalion is fighting from its tanks. Well, we are not fighting from our tanks right now,'' Young said. ''We are certainly capable of performing the missions that we have been assigned, there's no issue with that, but we do find ourselves somewhat challenged.''

    In Humvees, on tanks but never openly on base U.S. soldiers are carrying the Cold War-era weapon, first developed in the Soviet Union but now mass produced around the world.

    The AK is favored by many of the world's fighters, from child soldiers in Africa to rebel movements around the world, because it is light, durable and known to jam less frequently.

    Now U.S. troops who have picked up AKs on raids or confiscated them at checkpoints are putting the rifles to use and they like what they see.

    Some complain that standard U.S. military M16 and M4 rifles jam too easily in Iraq's dusty environment. Many say the AK has better ''knockdown'' power and can kill with fewer shots.

    ''The kind of war we are in now ... you want to be able to stop the enemy quick,'' said Sgt. 1st Class Tracy S. McCarson of Newport News, Va., an army scout, who carries an AK in his Humvee.

    Some troops say the AK is easier to maintain and a better close-quarters weapon. Also, it has ''some psychological affect on the enemy when you fire back on them with their own weapons,'' McCarson said.

    Most U.S. soldiers agree the M16 and the M4 a newer, shorter version of the M16 that has been used by American troops since the 1960s is better for long distance, precision shooting.

    But around Baqouba, troops are finding themselves attacked by assailants hidden deep in date palm groves. Or they are raiding houses, taking on enemies at close-quarters.

    Two weeks ago, Sgt. Sam Bailey of Cedar Falls, Iowa, was in a Humvee when a patrol came under rocket-propelled grenade and heavy machine gun fire. It was dark, the road narrow. On one side, there was a mud wall and palms trees, on the other a canal surrounded by tall grass.

    Bailey, who couldn't see who was firing, had an AK-47 on his lap and his M4 up front. The choice was simple.

    ''I put the AK on auto and started spraying,'' Bailey said.

    Some soldiers also say it's easier to get ammo for the AK they can pick it up on any raid or from any confiscated weapon.

    ''It's plentiful,'' said Sgt. Eric Harmon, a tanker who has a full 75-round drum, five 30-round magazines, plus 200-300 rounds in boxes for his AK. He has about 120 rounds for his M16.

    Young doesn't carry an AK but has fired one. He's considered banning his troops from carrying AKs, but hasn't yet because ''if I take the AK away from some of the soldiers, then they will not have a rifle to carry with them.''

    Staff Sgt. Michael Perez, a tanker, said he would take anything over his standard issue 9mm pistol when he's out of his tank.

    And the AK's durability has impressed him.

    ''They say you can probably drop this in the water and leave it overnight, pull it out in the morning, put in a magazine and it will work,'' Perez said.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    If so, for what specifically?

    Generalities are fine, but if you make a distinction between, say, tankers having to use AKs on foot patrol, and tankers on foot patrol period, I want to know.

    Also -- does the article ring true?

    Thanks!
    No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

  • #2
    If want to win, you've got to kill people.


    Do you want to win?
    I'd rather have a German division in front of me than a French division behind me.--Patton

    Comment


    • #3
      sound okay to me.

      I'm still pissed about the M-16's jamming during that ambush of Jessica Lynch's convoy.

      Yes I realize it's the desert, and the mantenance company probably wasn't keeping up on the cleaning of their rifles.

      But I can't help but think the Kalashnikov's are superior weapons to M-16's.

      Comment


      • #4
        There's probably a reason they are so popular.
        (\__/)
        (='.'=)
        (")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by LoneWolf
          If want to win, you've got to kill people.


          Do you want to win?
          Interesting question.

          Another interesting question:

          WHAT THE HELL DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH IT?
          No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

          Comment


          • #6
            I'm not at all bothered with them picking up AKs because they're better for the job at hand. I am a little bothered that they have to pick them up because we haven't bothered to supply them (or better) ourselves. I am more than a little bothered that tankers are being used for foot patrols -- I mean, are they really trained for that? It underlines that we are undermanned over there, if we have to misapply forces in this manner.
            No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

            Comment


            • #7
              The US should definitely have every soldier get acquainted with the AK47, if for no other reason than to know thy enemy.
              Visit First Cultural Industries
              There are reasons why I believe mankind should live in cities and let nature reclaim all the villages with the exception of a few we keep on display as horrific reminders of rural life.-Starchild
              Meat eating and the dominance and force projected over animals that is acompanies it is a gateway or parallel to other prejudiced beliefs such as classism, misogyny, and even racism. -General Ludd

              Comment


              • #8
                yes I already known that tank divisions are being counted along with the regular divisions as part of the total manpower in Iraq.

                It's pretty obvious that we are undermanned out there. And it doesn't suprise me they are being used for this purpose. I really don't have any problem with them being used this way. Our troops should be flexible. They all went to the same boot camp. They know how to fight.

                The lack of supply is a problem. But sometimes you can't get out of military regulations and procedures. They just aren't ever issued assault perosnal weapons. There is no procedure in place for issuing tank personnel assault personal weapons.

                well you may know how I feel. Even though I supported the war, it was obvious from the time the museum was looted, that the U.S. really has no idea what it's doing. I can care less about the artifacts, but what that signified, was the U.S. had no control over the country. And we still have no control over the borders, and we should. Yes I realize that would requie many, many more troops. But you should do the job right the first time, not half-assed.

                What can I say. I now think Bush's whole administration is incompetant. Even though I supported them a mere 6 months ago. There is no way in hell I am voting for Bush again.

                Comment


                • #9
                  AH, Monk, I didn't take your point. I apologize.
                  I'd rather have a German division in front of me than a French division behind me.--Patton

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    At the last 3 weeks, I gained a little ( very little. ) experience with M-16s.

                    Likes:

                    they're light. very light.

                    dislikes:

                    they jam in the sand like hell! After getting basic outdoors training, I couldn't even complete the safeguarding of the weapon, because the sand made it jam.

                    The AK, and weapons with similar loading mechanisms maybe heavier, but at least they don't jam! Our commander promissed to teach us about the Galil, though.
                    urgh.NSFW

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Dissident
                      yes I already known that tank divisions are being counted along with the regular divisions as part of the total manpower in Iraq.

                      It's pretty obvious that we are undermanned out there. And it doesn't suprise me they are being used for this purpose. I really don't have any problem with them being used this way. Our troops should be flexible. They all went to the same boot camp. They know how to fight.

                      The lack of supply is a problem. But sometimes you can't get out of military regulations and procedures. They just aren't ever issued assault perosnal weapons. There is no procedure in place for issuing tank personnel assault personal weapons.

                      well you may know how I feel. Even though I supported the war, it was obvious from the time the museum was looted, that the U.S. really has no idea what it's doing. I can care less about the artifacts, but what that signified, was the U.S. had no control over the country. And we still have no control over the borders, and we should. Yes I realize that would requie many, many more troops. But you should do the job right the first time, not half-assed.

                      What can I say. I now think Bush's whole administration is incompetant. Even though I supported them a mere 6 months ago. There is no way in hell I am voting for Bush again.
                      Dissident, you are the lifeblood of a healthy democracy.
                      "I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
                      'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by LoneWolf
                        If want to win, you've got to kill people.
                        Against guerrilla warfare, you don't win by killing people.
                        (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
                        (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
                        (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          well you don't win by not killing them

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            You win by not having them there in the first place.
                            I'm building a wagon! On some other part of the internets, obviously (but not that other site).

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              urgh.NSFW

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X