Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Sounds interesting. Is it worth a read for someone who has a B.A. in Econ (like as a refresher or quick reference)?![Big Grin](https://apolyton.net/core/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Yep. I dealt with simple game theory in my IR classes (especially Intro to IR and Defense Policy) and in Econometrics. The IR example of Prisoner's Dilemma that my classes used the most is the Cold War (arms race), which is sometimes also used to explain a Conflict Spiral (which doesn't work perfectly, because we never went to war
).
Hard Heads, Soft Hearts, by Alan Blinder, Professor of Economics at Princeton and former Chairman of Clinton's Council of Economic Advisors is the best economics book I have ever read. Its only about 200 pages, but it does an absolutely outstanding job of introducing someone who is not familiar with economics to economic thinking about current micro and macro policy issues. I commend this book in the highest possible terms.
Sounds interesting. Is it worth a read for someone who has a B.A. in Econ (like as a refresher or quick reference)?
![Big Grin](https://apolyton.net/core/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Most introductory International Affairs books now devote a few pages to the "Prisoners Dilema" and Zero-Sum v. Non-Zero Sum Games. They usually throw in an example involving the Peloponesian Wars or the World Wars. That's about as simple as it gets.
Yep. I dealt with simple game theory in my IR classes (especially Intro to IR and Defense Policy) and in Econometrics. The IR example of Prisoner's Dilemma that my classes used the most is the Cold War (arms race), which is sometimes also used to explain a Conflict Spiral (which doesn't work perfectly, because we never went to war
![Big Grin](https://apolyton.net/core/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![evil grin](https://apolyton.net/core/images/smilies/evil2.gif)
Maybe you can correct me, but does it have much place in Political Science outside of abstract mathematical modeling of military conflicts and politics like they do at MIT? There doesn't seem to be much that can be proven via gaming that can't be done with mountains of evidence
![yeah right!](https://apolyton.net/core/images/smilies/hm.gif)
I also second AS's pick of Stiglitz and Blinder as good econ primers. For those who need to know about economics without having take an econ class, it's indespensible.
Comment