Originally posted by PLATO
Mtg, If that law had been later overturned and Johnson had been dismissed as President, what would the Constitution guide us to do?
Mtg, If that law had been later overturned and Johnson had been dismissed as President, what would the Constitution guide us to do?
What is more interesting, because AFAIK, it's a huge gap in the Constitution (since the Framers never really intended judicial review

Traditionally, the judiciary most often takes the approach that disputes between the Executive and Legislative branches are "political" and beyond judicial review. That's somewhat gutless, but practical because the judiciary can't really afford to seriously piss off the rest of the government.
Comment