Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What's up with the Hutton inquiry?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    No, just a person aware of the facts.

    The BBC are very pro-active. They believe that beyond covering news, it's their job to "create them" and "drive issues".

    It's called a marxist approach to newsmaking and it sucks.

    Comment


    • #17
      I still don't see what's wrong with covering both the propoghanda claims of the British and American governments and the Iraqi propoghanda. Seems fair to me.

      Best news in Britain is the Channel 4 News anyway.
      Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
      Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
      We've got both kinds

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by TheStinger
        I can except a certian bias, but I think giving eqaul weight to Iraqi news sources is just wrong
        Especially since those Iraqi sources were so ludicriss. Does anyone remember the Iraqi state media claiming they'd killed all of the invaders and that a "river of blood" was flowing back to Kuwait?
        Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

        Comment


        • #19
          I just ignore the crap that comes from it anyway. For me it is a non-story: suicide is never anyone else's fault.
          www.my-piano.blogspot

          Comment

          Working...
          X