Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Medical Marijuana receiving VERY mainstream support

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Medical Marijuana receiving VERY mainstream support

    Published on Sunday, August 17, 2003 by the Boston Globe
    The Shifting Medical View on Marijuana
    by Lester Grinspoon

    IN A RECENT poll conducted by Medscape, a website directed at health care providers, 76 percent of physicians and 89 percent of nurses said they thought marijuana should be available as a medicine. That's a big change from the attitude in the medical community a decade ago, when few health providers believed (or would acknowledge) that cannabis had any medical utility. That was not surprising; physicians receive most of their new drug education from journal articles or from drug company advertisements and promotions, and neither of these sources provides information about medical marijuana.

    The dramatic change of view is the result of clinical experience. Doctors and nurses have seen that for many patients cannabis is more useful, less toxic, and less expensive than the conventional medicines prescribed for diverse syndromes and symptoms, including multiple sclerosis, Crohn's disease, migraine headaches, severe nausea and vomiting, convulsive disorders, the AIDS wasting syndrome, chronic pain, and many others.

    A mountain of anecdotal evidence speaks to marijuana's medical versatility and striking lack of toxicity. Even the federally sponsored Institute of Medicine has grudgingly acknowledged that marijuana has medical uses.

    However, the government itself refuses to learn. Its official position, as stated recently by the new DEA administrator, is that "marijuana is not a medicine."

    When it is at last obliged to acknowledge the medical value of marijuana, the government will be faced with the problem its present attitude has allowed it to avoid. How can it grant access to marijuana for medical purposes while prohibiting its use for other, disapproved purposes? One solution is what I would call "pharmaceuticalization": the development of prescription medicines derived from the therapeutically active components of cannabis and synthetic variants of these molecules.

    This process has already begun in a small way. The Food and Drug Administration, under pressure from a growing number of physicians and patients, approved Marinol for the treatment of the nausea and vomiting of cancer chemotherapy. Marinol is synthetic tetrahydrocannabinol, the primary active cannabinoid in marijuana, packed in a capsule with sesame oil so that it cannot be smoked.

    But relatively few patients have found Marinol useful. It is less effective than marijuana for several reasons. Because it must be taken orally, the effect appears only after an hour or more. That eliminates one of the main advantages of smoked or vaporized inhaled cannabis, which works so quickly that the patient can adjust the dose with remarkable precision. Furthermore, Marinol is more expensive than marijuana, even with the prohibition tariff that raises the price of illicit cannabis.

    Several other products, including extracts of marijuana, are in the pipeline, but they are unlikely to be any more useful or less expensive than plant marijuana. Even if pharmaceutical companies invest the many millions of dollars it will take to develop useful cannabinoid products, they will not displace natural marijuana for most purposes. And because the primary, and for many the only, advantage of these drugs will be legality, their manufacturers will have an interest in vigorously enforced prohibition that raises the price of the competitive product, street marijuana.

    The realities of human need are incompatible with the demand for a legally enforceable distinction between medicine and all other uses of cannabis. Marijuana not only has many potential medical uses, but can also safely enhance many pleasures and ease many discomforts of everyday life. In many cases what lay people do in prescribing marijuana for themselves is not very different from what physicians do when they provide prescriptions for psychoactive or other drugs.

    The only workable way of realizing the full potential of this remarkable substance, including its full medical potential, is to free it from a dual set of regulations -- the laws that control prescription drugs, and the often cruel and self-defeating criminal laws that control psychoactive substances used to for nonmedical purposes. These mutually reinforcing laws strangle marijuana's uniquely multifaceted potential. The only way to liberate the potential is to give marijuana the same legal status as alcohol, a far more dangerous substance.

    Marijuana should be removed from the medical and criminal control systems. It should be legalized for adults for all uses.

    Dr. Lester Grinspoon, an emeritus professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, is author of "Marihuana Reconsidered" coauthor of "Marijuana, the Forbidden Medicine."
    from http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0817-02.htm



    So prohibitionists, do you think the a professor of psychiatry at Harvard, the federal government's Institute of Medicine, and a vast majority of surveyed medical professionals are wrong? Maybe reefer madness has infected their brains.

    I think our more economic-minded 'Poly members will appreciate how much money our health care system could save in terms of R&D and other costs by legalizing. As reported, black-market marijuana (with inflated prices) still costs less than less effective alternatives to the "drug".

    Apparantly, this new attitude about marijuana is new in the medical community. Just a decade ago, the medical industry wasn't so gung-ho about legalization.

    One thing is for sure, don't look for anything to change as long as we are stuck with Dubya and his pot-hating G-Men.

    Legalize.
    To us, it is the BEAST.

  • #2
    76 percent of physicians and 89 percent of nurses said they thought marijuana should be available as a medicine.
    Hmm...and Strangelove says we should ask doctors. I wonder what he'll say to this...

    Comment


    • #3
      Legalize for 18 or 21+ and slap a tax on it.

      Comment


      • #4
        99% of statistics are made up on the spot. Also an official opinion from the AMA would carry more weight than a survey.
        I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
        For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

        Comment


        • #5
          In 1937, the AMA opposed banning pot for even recreational use. From 1937-1939, ~3,000 doctors were convicted by the federal bureau of narcotics headed by Harry Anslinger of illegally prescribing narcotics. In 1939, the AMA reversed it's position to support the ban that went into effect in 1937 anyway. From 1939-1952, only 3 doctors were convicted by the bureau of illegally prescribing narcotics. Interesting numbers, 3,000 doctors in 2 years, then 3 doctors in 13 years.

          In 1937, Harry Anslinger told a Congress bent on banning pot that it turned users into homicidal maniacs who kill without remorse, i.e., soulless creatures. In 1953, Anslinger told Congress that pot was a communist plot to pacify Americans.

          Comment


          • #6
            "mono has crazy flow and can rhyme words that shouldn't, like Eminem"
            Drake Tungsten
            "get contacts, get a haircut, get better clothes, and lose some weight"
            Albert Speer

            Comment


            • #7
              99% of statistics are made up on the spot.
              Like that one?

              Also an official opinion from the AMA would carry more weight than a survey.
              The AMA has been corrupted by the feds as my previous post shows, it knows what can happen if it goes against the feds. But if the survey ~accurately reflects the opinions of those in the medical profession, then why would their opinions be of less value than the bureaucratic heads of the organisation?

              Comment


              • #8
                I know I want my sweet pill that makes life better!
                "mono has crazy flow and can rhyme words that shouldn't, like Eminem"
                Drake Tungsten
                "get contacts, get a haircut, get better clothes, and lose some weight"
                Albert Speer

                Comment


                • #9
                  "medical potential"? It's not going to "cure" any disease or save anyone's life, anyways. Whatever...

                  Legalize it, OK, but just because there aren't enough reasons to prohibit it, not because of the supposed "benefits" that will come from its legalization.
                  DULCE BELLUM INEXPERTIS

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    "medical potential"? It's not going to "cure" any disease or save anyone's life, anyways. Whatever...
                    Does aspirin cure disease? No, it can slow down disease and delay death as well as hastening death in some cases. Most drugs don't cure anything, they merely reduce pain or slow disease or it's worsening symptoms. If these non-curing drugs are still medicines, then pot is a medicine because it too can slow disease, reduce pain, or lessen symptoms. AIDS is a good example from what I've heard, people with AIDS tend to waste away because nausea impacts their appetite while pot is an appetite stimulant and nausea suppressor.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      It's already legal in my state.

                      my state rules!

                      if only I could find a good doctor...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Good news

                        Although I doubt for some reason that mainstream politicians give a damn about science or such weird concepts as common sense....
                        If its no fun why do it? Dance like noone is watching...

                        Comment


                        • #13


                          Homegrown is much more fun though!!

                          Legalise!
                          "I work in IT so I'd be buggered without a computer" - Words of wisdom from Provost Harrison
                          "You can be wrong AND jewish" - Wiglaf :love:

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Woohoo!
                            "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
                            -Bokonon

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              ...that may be so, but most of the people in this thread (for example...perhaps also most of the legalization movement) seem to be interested mostly in the "recreational" aspects of Marijuana anyways, and not the "medical" ones...

                              Unlike some of you eager people, it seems, I wouldn't want to be in the position to "need" a marijuana prescription...

                              Anyways, carry on.
                              DULCE BELLUM INEXPERTIS

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X