Was Paul McCartney replaced with a look-a-like in 1966?

[monkspider]

Here's an interesting website that my friend sent me to, I can't say that I'm completely convinced, but he does make some very good points! Maybe someone here more knowledgeable in some of the things he discusses can confirm or debunk this.

http://www.anycities.com/user/uberkinder/index.html

NOTE, there are a couple times where this site will lead you to a dead-end. Just click back, click on go to main page, and navigate your way around the bad spots from there.

[Koyaanisqatsi]

I have an interesting book about this...it's called The Walrus Was Paul (don't remember the author.) I don't know why, but after reading it and looking at some of the photos in the middle, I was a little freaked out.

*edit: Author was Gary Patterson

[SlowwHand]

No, he wan't replaced, in any year.

[Koyaanisqatsi]

You're no fun.

[Dom Pedro II]

So does this mean that the Paul McCartney we've been seeing since 1966 is actually a fake?

[Dis]

the more important question is. Does it really matter if he's a fake?

[Whaleboy]

Maybe Kennedy is alive somewhere.....

[Dom Pedro II]

Yeah, that's what I'm saying... I mean, who cares about the old Paul, the new one is better!

[reds4ever]

Originally posted by Dom Pedro II
So does this mean that the Paul McCartney we've been seeing since 1966 is actually a fake?

As fake as his wifes leg!

[BeBMan]

Actually Paul was the only one who wasn´t replaced.

[Dom Pedro II]

Eh? So everybody except him is a fake?


9:45... I'd say its time to start drinkin!

[Giant_Squid]

Paul McCartney was replaced by Elvis. That's why they had to fake Elvis' death.

[The Mad Monk]

Goo goo gachoob.