Originally posted by Agathon
But this is just the false equivalency I mentioned. You seem to be unable to grasp it.
But this is just the false equivalency I mentioned. You seem to be unable to grasp it.
I claimed SNR ratios are not sufficient to determine a sound judgement on overall audio quality.
I claimed that fuel efficiency is not sufficient to determine a sound judgement of overall car quality.
I claimed that fuel efficiency is not sufficient to determine a sound judgement of overall car quality.
Claim #1 is about a specific part of an audio player only, ie: audio output quality.
Claim #2 takes a claim about a specific part of a car (fuel efficiency of the engine) and applies it to the entire vehicle's quality.
I was speaking purely of audio quality when comparing SNR numbers, just like if you're speaking purely of fuel efficiency you'd compare MPG numbers.
I did not claim anything about MPG. That's your little insertion either intended to fudge the argument or because you didn't read mine.
Your analogy was rigged and didn't represent a parallel of our discussion. In fact, when you think it through and apply your analogy correctly, it proves my case.
SNR numbers -> imply audio quality.
MPG numbers -> imply fuel efficiency.
Now to use your example from the last thread, it'd be akin to you saying MPG numbers do not necessarily mean a car is more fuel efficient...which is a tad bit absurd, isn't it?
mutatis mutandis
Comment