The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Aircraft carriers are only for one thing...projecting power. Where, exactly, does Japan need to project power to protect her national interests? DPRK can be reached by current airfields. I believe China falls within range of available bombers. Where exactly will these carriers operate, and what will their mission be?
I am all for Japan providing for her own defense, but I am unsure if it is wise to reinstitute offensive capabilities.
"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
Where, exactly, does Japan need to project power to protect her national interests?
From the article:
The Japanese carriers can be deployed as command ships to give the Maritime Self-Defense Force, as the Japanese navy is called, a modest ability to project power into the sea lanes that are vital to Japan's economy.
KH FOR OWNER! ASHER FOR CEO!! GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!
Where, exactly, does Japan need to project power to protect her national interests?
From the article:
The Japanese carriers can be deployed as command ships to give the Maritime Self-Defense Force, as the Japanese navy is called, a modest ability to project power into the sea lanes that are vital to Japan's economy.
Yes I read that. Where are they planning on the US navy going? Two carriers are "modest" ability!?! Something just doesn't feel right about this.
"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
U.S. ally or not, it's prudent to have some sort of force projection capability in case the Chinese ever get uppity in the South China Sea and cut off the sea lanes that supply all of Japan's oil.
KH FOR OWNER! ASHER FOR CEO!! GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!
Yes I read that. Where are they planning on the US navy going? Two carriers are "modest" ability!?! Something just doesn't feel right about this.
Well...Japan already has two large LHD's, with flight decks and everything. They are about the size of the apperently "dedicated" carriers they plan on building.
Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.
Originally posted by PLATO1003
Yes I read that. Where are they planning on the US navy going? Two carriers are "modest" ability!?! Something just doesn't feel right about this.
*cough*North Korea*cough*
I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
"The Japanese carriers, however, will not come close to the newly commissioned U.S. leviathan, the 98,000-ton Ronald Reagan with its 80 warplanes"
Holy shît, we really do dominate militarily, don't we?
"mono has crazy flow and can rhyme words that shouldn't, like Eminem"
Drake Tungsten
"get contacts, get a haircut, get better clothes, and lose some weight"
Albert Speer
The only other country with real carriers are the French, and they have one with 40 planes.
Heck, why, no, as part of all this national deficit spending they have to pump up the eocnomy, make a couple of Nimitz class equivalent ships?
If you don't like reality, change it! me
"Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
"it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
"Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw
Originally posted by monolith94
"The Japanese carriers, however, will not come close to the newly commissioned U.S. leviathan, the 98,000-ton Ronald Reagan with its 80 warplanes"
Holy shît, we really do dominate militarily, don't we?
That's a bit of a misnomer. The Planes the Gipper carries are CTOL, or "Conventional Take off, landing". They can travel signifigantly farther and carry signifigantly more ordnance than STOVL planes, which is what the JMSDF is buying.
Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.
These carriers aren't meant to deal with North Korea; NK is well within the range of Japanese land-based air power. These carriers are meant for protecting sea lanes against an improving Chinese navy.
Heck, why, no, as part of all this national deficit spending they have to pump up the eocnomy, make a couple of Nimitz class equivalent ships?
They've been engaging in deficit spending for years now and it hasn't helped them out of their malaise. A couple of big carriers won't help the Japanese economy in the slightest.
KH FOR OWNER! ASHER FOR CEO!! GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!
It's just like in that South Park episode, "Chinpoko mon"! They failed in their attempt to take over the youth of America with trendy cartoons and merchandise, so now they are building carriers to finish Pearl Harbor off!
Comment