In Sweden, we are supposed to call it "mejl" or "e-post"
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
France commits idiotic act to try to show it is superior to America... bans "e-mail"
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Combat Ingrid
Similar language-preserving activities are going on in Sweden too and presumably in many other countries as well. Yet it's apparently only the French that are the chauvinistic morons.
Being rather ignorant on this issue, I ask you to please explain to me why it's so bad only in the case of France and not other countries? I never heard anyone talking about "Sweden commits idiotic act to show it is superior to America blah blah blah"
Comment
-
Originally posted by TCO
Ok, you suck too. Feel better now? We have to prioritze which socialist Euro country we taunt, ok? France is more important than you.I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Comment
-
Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
I'm not saying you're bashing them. But I do think there is opportunism present in this thread. Especially in overreaction and calling it a death of free speech in France...
I'd have to agree with this. For the record, I don't think this is the death of free speech in France or anything else as equally absurd. It's just a silly decision made because of France's overwhelming belief in the superiority and purity of their own language (a pet peeve of mine).Rethink Refuse Reduce Reuse
Do It Ourselves
Comment
-
Originally posted by Osweld
It's not out of an 'overwhelming belief in the superiority and purity of their own language'. It's to preserve their own language and culture. I know this is hard for you to understand, since you come from the "great melting pot" where cultures are melted down and used to make coke cans and celluloid, but some people actually respect and cherish their heritage.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TCO
You've got to be kidding me. I think your point is strained to the point of weaselishness. If people use it, its damn practical.
I didn't say e-mail was impractical, just less practical, linguistically, than courriel for the French. Impractical is your strawman, not mine.Tutto nel mondo è burla
Comment
-
Originally posted by TCO
Kultur is the thing of the Nazis.
Badly wrong.
Who said : when I hear the world Kultur I take my gun ?
3rd Reich Minister of Propaganda Goebbels.
You should revise some ideas of yours.Statistical anomaly.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Comment
-
By DAVOUT:
In an above post I explained why, technically, e-mail cannot be adopted as a French word; but many others are adopted as they are written in english when there is no satisfactory equivalent. I discovered recently that happening is now a French word, because we were unable to build an equivalent meaning with the French language tools.
It's setting a government policy. So what? My company has policies dictating what language I can and can't use in correspondence.
How does it impact free speech when it applies only to government publications?
And on the notion that usgae should dictate what is used: goernments can seelct to use anyting they crae to: they ae not attempting to force the population to change usage, so there is nothing wrong with this, excep that it riles the French haters here.
By Drake:
The article says the change was made to help stem an influx of English words.
It's to preserve their own language and culture.
On the cultural issue I have no argument. It s their culture and is, in fact, quite worthy of being preserved.
End of argument on my part!"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
Comment
Comment