This seems to have quietened down a bit, but a thought provoking letter I saw in the Times from an ex-RAF pilot deserves discussion here.
During the Second World War, the BBC wasn't asked to be neutral between Churchill and Hitler, and no-one could really have expected them to.
So why do people expect the BBC to be neutral between Tony Blair and the mass-murderer that is dictator Saddam Hussein?
During the Second World War, the BBC wasn't asked to be neutral between Churchill and Hitler, and no-one could really have expected them to.
So why do people expect the BBC to be neutral between Tony Blair and the mass-murderer that is dictator Saddam Hussein?
Comment