The President is required by the Constitution to give a State of the Union address.
Article 2, section 3
Presumably the Framers intended for the President to be truthful, but in any event, it is against Federal law to lie to Congress.
So, the next question is, did the Prez lie during the last state of the union, specifically re: the alleged attempt of Iraq to buy uranium from Niger. That depands on whether you believe the he knew the information was false.
From Salon:
The ambassador's NYT piece.
There can be no doubt that Cheney would have passed that information on to the President. So Bush knew he was lying when when he said that Iraq was trying to get uranium.
Obviously, a Republican Congress, especially one as venal as this one, isn't going to take the President to task for this. Thought it's possible that if the Democrats could borrow a backbone, that the few remaining memebers of the Republican Party with any integrity would stand with them.
The question is: does this meet the test of a high crime and misdemeanor? Well, it's perjury, the same crime of which Clinton was impeached.
Does the seriousness of the lie matter? Is a lie about infidelity more serious than a lie which is calculated to bring about a war?
Article 2, section 3
Section 3. He shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient;
Presumably the Framers intended for the President to be truthful, but in any event, it is against Federal law to lie to Congress.
So, the next question is, did the Prez lie during the last state of the union, specifically re: the alleged attempt of Iraq to buy uranium from Niger. That depands on whether you believe the he knew the information was false.
From Salon:
on Sunday, former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV wrote in the New York Times that the CIA sent him to Niger in 2002 to assess the validity of the alleged uranium sale. Wilson wrote that he'd quickly determined the reports were false and that his findings were forwarded to Vice President **** Cheney.
The ambassador's NYT piece.
There can be no doubt that Cheney would have passed that information on to the President. So Bush knew he was lying when when he said that Iraq was trying to get uranium.
Obviously, a Republican Congress, especially one as venal as this one, isn't going to take the President to task for this. Thought it's possible that if the Democrats could borrow a backbone, that the few remaining memebers of the Republican Party with any integrity would stand with them.
The question is: does this meet the test of a high crime and misdemeanor? Well, it's perjury, the same crime of which Clinton was impeached.
Does the seriousness of the lie matter? Is a lie about infidelity more serious than a lie which is calculated to bring about a war?
Comment