Question about magnetism

[Kuciwalker]

Possibly, though it would have to stay perfectly situated.

[Sava]

Originally posted by Urban Ranger


1. The field does not decay, as least not according to classical EM theory.

2. No, you cannot make a perpetual machine out of it, because the small disc just sits there.

You could fashion a wheel of small magnets, then put the larger one under the one side so it spins constantly. If the field didn't decay, there would be magnetic power plants... but there aren't.

[Spiffor]

I've looked a bit into the matter, and from what I understand, the biggest problem with hovering magnets is instability: the magnetic field tries to upturn the hovering magnet, to have attracting poles facing each other.

You can find cool videos on this site :


Is it possible to build magnets with only one polarity ?

[Angelo Scotto]

Originally posted by Spiffor
Is it possible to build magnets with only one polarity ?

I know this one!

No, absolutely not, you can't and it was a direct consequence of Maxwell equations (but don't ask me why because i don't remember...)

edited
Ok, i couldn't resist, i checked, it was the second one (also called Gauss' Law for Magnetism), and as you can read here:
the form of Gauss' law for magnetic fields is then a statement that there are no magnetic monopoles.

[Solver]

Any decent explanation as to WHY a magent will retain both poles even if you cut it and slice into small pieces?

[Eli]

You can find cool videos on this site :

Umm. How did they make the frog hover?

[Eli]

Originally posted by Solver
Any decent explanation as to WHY a magent will retain both poles even if you cut it and slice into small pieces?

The entire magnetism thingie happens because the atoms inside the magnet are "ordered", so all the moving electrons create a magnetic field to one direction, instead of cancelling each other out like in normal matter.

If you cut the magnet to parts, they atoms will still be ordered correctly and will still create a magnetic field.

[Whaleboy]

You could fashion a wheel of small magnets, then put the larger one under the one side so it spins constantly. If the field didn't decay, there would be magnetic power plants... but there aren't

You watched that film with the magnetic lock didnt you? *tries to think of title*, it was similar to the Indiana Jones type but I CANT THINK OF THE ******* NAME!!!

[Solver]

If you cut the magnet to parts, they atoms will still be ordered correctly and will still create a magnetic field.

And what if I cut the magnet in temperature of absolute null, whatever it's called in English, but you get it. I realize it's theoretical, but then the atoms would have no chance to rearrange... would it be a monopole magnet, or would it cease to emit the magnetic field?

[Spiffor]

Umm. How did they make the frog hover?

With the supraconductivity method. Unfortunately, I didn't understand anything about it.

[Solver]

With the supraconductivity method. Unfortunately, I didn't understand anything about it.

[Angelo Scotto]

Originally posted by Solver

If you cut the magnet to parts, they atoms will still be ordered correctly and will still create a magnetic field.

And what if I cut the magnet in temperature of absolute null, whatever it's called in English, but you get it. I realize it's theoretical, but then the atoms would have no chance to rearrange... would it be a monopole magnet, or would it cease to emit the magnetic field?

At 0 K i believe that electrons won't be able to move, so there will be no magnetic field
...
i think...

Anyway when you cut the magnet atoms don't have to rearrange i think...

[Adalbertus]

Umm. How did they make the frog hover?

Superconductivity is only remotely connected to it. Frogs (and likewise Yanks, Tommies and Krauts) are diamagnetic. Which means they are expelled by a magnetic field. If you shape your magnetic field accordingly (say, you'll shape the polar pieces of a large electromagnet like a banana, the ends pointing upwards), the frog is expelled by the field and cannot move to the sides either because there the field is stronger.
Superconductivity is simply the means to make magnets which are strong enough.

[KrazyHorse]

Originally posted by Sava
does the magnetic property eventually decay? if not, you could make a perpetual motion engine...

I was asked this very same question by somebody else recently...

Magnetism does decay eventually. The hotter your magnet is, the quicker it does so. Above the "Curie point" of the material, it no longer exhibits ferromagnetic properties at all.

Reason is that large-scale ferromagnetism is caused by thousands of aligned magnetic "regions". Their own magnetic field holds them in place, but eventually the vibration caused by temperature dealigns them...

[Adalbertus]

Originally posted by alva
In a couple of thousand years, the fields will reverse.
Not that this in anyway answers your question, just showing I watch scientific programs

What you've probably heard of, is the earth's magnetic field, which indeed reverses its sign in about that time span.

A normal permanent magnet will keep its field much longer (unless heated to the so-called Curie temperature, where a ferromagnet loses its ferromagnetism; in the case of iron it's around 770 °C). In most cases the fully magnetised state is not the most stable one, and so the magnetisation has a tendency to decay (very slowly). The stable state is one in which there are small volumes of the material magnetised homogeneously (magnetic domains) whose overall magnetisation compensates each other.