Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Maybe Bush Wasn't Lying about WoMD?
Collapse
X
-
Maybe Bush Wasn't Lying about WoMD?
Eventis is the only refuge of the spammer. Join us now.
Long live teh paranoia smiley!Tags: None
-
Misinterpreting the Evidences for and against WMDs, because they wanted to believe there were any?
Yes, could be a possible explanation.
The tendency of humans to misinterpret evidences to fit their own beliefs (or their own theory about the world) is one of the reasons, why Scientists introduced Double Blind Experiments as a standard experimental procedure.Tamsin (Lost Girl): "I am the Harbinger of Death. I arrive on winds of blessed air. Air that you no longer deserve."
Tamsin (Lost Girl): "He has fallen in battle and I must take him to the Einherjar in Valhalla"
-
What Proteus said!
However, Iraq was probably the most heavily monitored piece of land on the planet betwen Gulf War I and Gulf War II. I find it hard to believe that they saw WMD but could track them, even some! Couple that with the shady (at best) evidence before the war, and one becomes suspicious that they didnt know they were there in the first place.
In that case, if we didnt go to war on a lie, we certainly went on a speculation."I work in IT so I'd be buggered without a computer" - Words of wisdom from Provost Harrison
"You can be wrong AND jewish" - Wiglaf :love:
Comment
-
I hardly doubt that there were WoMDs in Iraq, just as US and UK stated.
I also hardly doubt that Saddam used the several months time during the inspections and before for quickly disposing, hiding and dissimilating any traces of it. He knew he was facing defeat and hoped to entangle US and UK in big moral troubles once they can't find the evidence.
Iran and Syria and Russia were probably very eager assistants as they all are very much against US interference in the ME and against possible "reigning in" of the chaotic totalitarian governments in the ME.
Comment
-
I still have questions about the true objectives of this mid-east campaign, Oil/money arguement versus the weakness of the evidence political fumble.The world is a messy place, and unfortunately the messier it gets, the more work we have to do."
Comment
-
Jeez man!
Nobody worries about missile gaps anymore
In fact, no one with half a brain ever worried about them
that's right. we all worried about a mine shaft gap.
i can buy that the administration believed what they said. unfortunately, i don't think it's enough. had they made the basis of the invasion on some other grounds, i wouldn't have as big of a problem with it now--particularly when i didn't before.B♭3
Comment
-
For a different perspective see THIS article from Sunday's Washington Post. In it, Rolf Eckeus, head of UNSCOM from 1991-1997, argues that we may not find stored weapons of mass destruction because the Iraqis were not able to develop pure enough agents to keep them from decaying. Instead, Eckeus argues, the Iraqis developed production methods which could brought to bear on fairly short notice if needed. Comments?
edit: typosOld posters never die.
They j.u.s.t..f..a..d..e...a...w...a...y....
Comment
-
We have yet to find the production facilities.I mean, how small could they be, to porduce weapons in quantities that make them usefull in war? (very large amounts)
But even if this is the case, while it shows Iraq in violation of resolutions, it still is not the same as saying large stockpiles existed at the moment, which was the claim made and the justification given.
A importantly, were are the ties to Al Qaeda?If you don't like reality, change it! me
"Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
"it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
"Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw
Comment
-
Originally posted by GePap
We have yet to find the production facilities.I mean, how small could they be, to porduce weapons in quantities that make them usefull in war? (very large amounts)
A importantly, were are the ties to Al Qaeda?
Comment
-
the Iraqis developed production methods which could brought to bear on fairly short notice if needed.
Still a far cry indeed from a pressing, imminent threat to the United States (won't even mention the lack of means of delivery).
Even farther from a justification for invasion.
Comment
-
Exactly how many WoMD does the USA own? What right do they have to own them that others dont? Not strictly related, but its a relevant question.
We have all become so caught up in the USA in its illegitimate role as "international policeman" that we have forgotten that it is merely another nation, no more or less valid than any other. Couple that with the fact that a recent BBC poll showed the USA to be the greatest threat to international peace, second only to Al Qaeda, but then, the latter is incapable of causing serious collatoral damage."I work in IT so I'd be buggered without a computer" - Words of wisdom from Provost Harrison
"You can be wrong AND jewish" - Wiglaf :love:
Comment
-
We have all become so caught up in the USA in its illegitimate role as "international policeman" that we have forgotten that it is merely another nation, no more or less valid than any other.
it's not "merely another nation", but rather a regional hegemon.
regional hegemons will do everything to increase their power, including crushing minor powers to demonstrate its strength, as well as seeking to find ways to consistently reduce the ability of other potential hegemons to become hegemons themselves.
swatting iraq and afghanistan aside sends a strong message to threats against the united states, as well as giving the united states more places from which it can exert pressure on minor and major powers such as china and iran.B♭3
Comment
Comment