Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Do these people never learn?! Frist backs Ban on Gay Marriage.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Soon, sex was placed under the microscope. In 1919, an entrepreneurial homosexual, Magnus Hirschfeld, founded the Institute for Sexology in Berlin, Germany.8 The Institute studied the burgeoning homosexual subculture, which was challenging traditional family morality in film, stage and in the increasingly decadent "cabaret" culture of post-World War I Germany. As historian Paul Johnson notes, "Stage and night-club shows in Berlin were the least inhibited of any major capital. Plays, novels and even paintings touched on such themes as homosexuality, sado-masochism, transvestitism and incest; and it was in Germany that Freud’s writings were most fully absorbed by the intelligentsia and penetrated the widest range of artistic expression."9 Meanwhile, "the Church, and, above all, the comfortable, industrious middle classes, were savaged and ridiculed."10 In such an atmosphere, Adolf Hitler was able to persuade millions of Germans that he alone could restore decency and order, despite the fact that many of his earliest supporters in the "Brownshirts" were sexual deviants themselves.11

    I didn´t read any further. this is so close to holocaust denial, the provider of this page should get a letter from the public prosecutor.
    justice is might

    Comment


    • #17
      while I can understand the ban on homosexual marriage, that of ethnic minorities is hilarious.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Gatekeeper
        Our damn leaders just want to f*ck up the U.S. Constitution everytime they get a f*cking hair up their arses.
        Why should they be held to a higher standerd than the judges?
        I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
        For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

        Comment


        • #19
          my state already passed a ban on gay marriage recently.

          actually the way it was worded- it said marriage can only be the union between a man and a woman.

          So it certainly is possible to have a ban on gay marriage.

          Comment


          • #20
            by the way, I don't think gays should be getting married.

            Comment


            • #21
              the sense behind marriage is the foundation of a family. that means reproduction. even if they adopt (and screw) a child, they don't reproduce. so it's not the real thing and therefore shouldn't be considered equal.

              Comment


              • #22
                A ban on gay marraige is absurd. I don't think it is possible to make a reasonable case that gays getting married effects the rest of the population in a negative way. This is America.
                For your photo needs:
                http://www.canstockphoto.com?r=146

                Sell your photos

                Comment


                • #23
                  I almost wished that the Christian religion was correct... heaven and hell, etc... then I could bask in contentedness knowing that these ****ers will burn in hell.
                  To us, it is the BEAST.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    why would they burn in hell?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      IIRC, loving thy neighbor and such is a prerequisite for heaven. Also, using the Lord's name in vane is against the rules also. And creating a constitutional amendment based upon some sick, bigotted, hateful interpretation of God's will is certainly taking his name in vane.
                      To us, it is the BEAST.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Sava
                        IIRC, loving thy neighbor and such is a prerequisite for heaven. Also, using the Lord's name in vane is against the rules also. And creating a constitutional amendment based upon some sick, bigotted, hateful interpretation of God's will is certainly taking his name in vane.
                        exactly
                        those wannabe-christian fundamentalists should read the bible for a change.
                        justice is might

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          that's just one of those commandment thingies.

                          all you have to do is have faith in jesus christ as your saviour and you are set for life- and afterlife.

                          I like low maintenance religions

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            all you have to do is have faith in jesus christ as your saviour
                            a popular Protestant idea... which is again, a convenient interpretation. Consider this:

                            Person A: Leads a good, moral life, never sinning or breaking a commandment. But never believes in Jesus.

                            Person B: Murder millions, but accepts Jesus on his deathbed.

                            I'm sorry, but Person A is going to heaven, Person B is going to hell... assuming Christianity is correct.
                            To us, it is the BEAST.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Gatekeeper
                              True, MtG, but it's still aggravating. And they always want to alter the U.S. Constitution with material that, if it ever passed, would make us look like damnable fools to (hopefully) more enlightened people in the future.

                              Hell, while we're at it, maybe we should go back to counting African-Americans as two-thirds a person (or whatever the fraction was in the U.S. Constitution so long ago). Maybe we oughta just go back to preaching the Gospel to those heathen Native Americans. Blast from the past, man! Yeah, them good old conservative values!

                              **sigh**

                              Gatekeeper
                              There are several reasons why they want to put their crazier issues into constitutional amendments.

                              1) This is the only way some of this stuff would be constitutional

                              2) They get more bang for their buck by proposing such dramatic measures, ie the press pays more attention.

                              3) They actually don't want to pass these measures because they either don't believe in them personally or they believe that the issue is a winner for them just as it is. Thus, they can whip up their supporters by proposing radical things and still assure that the issue is alive for the next campaign by arguing for an amendment that they are never going to get passed.
                              He's got the Midas touch.
                              But he touched it too much!
                              Hey Goldmember, Hey Goldmember!

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                hey I don't write the rules. I just go by what those latter day saints say when they come to my door

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X