Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

6 British Soldiers killed in Iraq

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Re: 6 British Soldiers killed in Iraq

    Originally posted by Cruddy

    Resistance forces generally don't operate in cities at the start of hostilities.
    Never a truer word was spoken.

    Wait until the resistance has a name and then you'll know that the trouble is really starting.

    Any candidate names? Here's mine:

    "The George W Bush Appreciation Society"

    "The Committee to de-Elect the President"
    Only feebs vote.

    Comment


    • #17
      Unfortunately, Bush and Wolfie want to prove they know more than Shinseki and other professionals

      Hey, since when did you like Shinseki?
      I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

      Comment


      • #18
        Agathon, total number Brit casualties lost to Iraqi fire up to capture of Baghdad = 8.

        Add six more to that and you can see we're not exactly in the throes of panic over them.

        They are doing what they are paid to do. Getting shot at and returning it 10 fold. They're not conscripts, they're volunteers - and the few (5?) who had weren't happy about the Iraq War were lifted out before it kicked offf.
        Some cry `Allah O Akbar` in the street. And some carry Allah in their heart.
        "The CIA does nothing, says nothing, allows nothing, unless its own interests are served. They are the biggest assembly of liars and theives this country ever put under one roof and they are an abomination" Deputy COS (Intel) US Army 1981-84

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Cruddy
          Agathon, total number Brit casualties lost to Iraqi fire up to capture of Baghdad = 8.

          Add six more to that and you can see we're not exactly in the throes of panic over them.

          They are doing what they are paid to do. Getting shot at and returning it 10 fold. They're not conscripts, they're volunteers - and the few (5?) who had weren't happy about the Iraq War were lifted out before it kicked offf.
          That's not what worries me. If this is indeed the beginning of a lengthy and popular resistance then there will be more deaths (I don't care whose) and that may make the overall situation worse.
          Only feebs vote.

          Comment


          • #20
            A resistance significant enough to pose a large threat would almost have to be state sponsored. Undoubtedly this sponsorship would be exposed. Given GW's trigger finger, the results could be disastorous for the sponsor nation. More likely you will continue to see loosly organized groups conducting random attacks for some time. The establishment of self governance should lessen, but not eliminate them
            "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

            Comment


            • #21
              As I understand it, troops involved were 1st Para helping train Iraqis as police.

              Maybe target wasn't the Brits but the "collaborators".

              Yep, definitely 100 miles outside of Basra - out of the Sh'ia area entirely.
              Some cry `Allah O Akbar` in the street. And some carry Allah in their heart.
              "The CIA does nothing, says nothing, allows nothing, unless its own interests are served. They are the biggest assembly of liars and theives this country ever put under one roof and they are an abomination" Deputy COS (Intel) US Army 1981-84

              Comment


              • #22
                turn Iraq over to the U.N. dammit!

                this is out of control.

                Comment


                • #23
                  The decision to disband the Iraqi army without severance pay definitely pushed many Iraqis over the edge. If only 1% out of the 400,000 decides to go extreme, we suddenly have to face 4,000 guerillas with lots of weapons and military trainings.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    yeah well we saw how well their weapons and military training served them in the war itself...

                    and gegap, i think you underestimate the british public, while loss to our forces is tragic, 6 deaths is hardly going to make people want to call the whole thing off.
                    "The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.

                    "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by C0ckney
                      yeah well we saw how well their weapons and military training served them in the war itself...
                      It's harder to kill Americans in wars.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        but easier to kill americans when not in war

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Only real cure to the problem is an economically viable Iraq which can mind it's own business.
                          Some cry `Allah O Akbar` in the street. And some carry Allah in their heart.
                          "The CIA does nothing, says nothing, allows nothing, unless its own interests are served. They are the biggest assembly of liars and theives this country ever put under one roof and they are an abomination" Deputy COS (Intel) US Army 1981-84

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Cruddy
                            Only real cure to the problem is an economically viable Iraq which can mind it's own business.
                            That means holding out until such thing becomes a reality.

                            Pulling out just because there are casualties is not an option.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              yes but a slow integration of U.N. peacekeepers is a viable option.

                              We could slowly, and I stress slowly, turn over control of Iraq to the U.N. peacekeepers.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                why would that make a difference, it would still be the foriegn troops in iraq, which is after all what the iraqis are objecting to. although the iraqis may find the UN a little more acceptable, do you honestly think that the hardliners wouldn't attack them as well?

                                the only difference would the fact that we'd be replacing the best armies there are in the world with a mish-mash of blue helmets tied up in red tape.
                                "The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.

                                "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X