The perfect foreign policy

[yavoon]

I think its pretty obvious this is an unrealistically ideal foreign policy. tho its also pretty vague, give it a lil while and some wild interpretations of it can turn into something almost usable. just shuffle words like "national interests" "victory" and a few others around and we can get goin!

[Imran Siddiqui]

For example, it does not have to right to pollute its own waters if it knows that the polluted water will flow across borders.

Who determines what is too polluted?

yes that would be a threat to the supply, but only if the shortage is deliberate. One nation does not have the right to decide what constitutes "basic necessities" for another.

So you'd end the technological advancement and benefit of the people of one state, simply because someone further down the river, who would have enough to for his own use, might require more at a later time?

Riparian rights have evolved well beyond that view.

No, because I would stop Hitler.

This would contradict point #2.

--

Anyway, I agree with Voltaire (the poster ), I wouldn't accept these views, but do things that benefit my state.