Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Good life

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Anyone who doesn't think this is better than previous eras, you can go live in them for all I care.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by skywalker
      Anyone who doesn't think this is better than previous eras, you can go live in them for all I care.


      The question people is NOT which era is better people!

      The question is what makes for a fully fulfilled and successful life. Is there one general standard (as the Greeks believed), or is there none?

      I asked the question about the hunter to force people to think: are the material benefts of modernity an aid to reaching such a life, are they opf no importance to reaching such a life, are they a hindrance to reaching such a life?
      If you don't like reality, change it! me
      "Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
      "it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
      "Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by GePap
        Does Freedom mean the good life? can someone fulfill themselves while in bondage? Can someone fulfill themselevs without ANY bonds?
        To come back to this, yes IMO, freedom plays an important role here.

        I don´t know what you mean by "Can someone fulfill themselves without ANY bonds?", but I guess the vast majority of people wouldn´t speak of a good life without certain freedoms. Because I can´t imagine how I would fulfill myself with lots of restrictions (imposed on me by others) around me. It seems another thing when you choose a situation for yourself willingly which implies restrictions (which you know before) too.
        Blah

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by GePap
          I asked the question about the hunter to force people to think: are the material benefts of modernity an aid to reaching such a life, are they opf no importance to reaching such a life, are they a hindrance to reaching such a life?
          I absolutely think certain benefits of modernity (not only material) are indeed an aid (not a garanty) for a good life. That doesn´t mean nobody could be happy in the middle ages too. However, if I compare chances of ordinary people in Germany today with chances of ordinary people some thousand years before in this area, I think we are better of now, not because every German now is happy (or happier), but everyone now has more chances to make something more of his life....
          Blah

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by BeBro


            For example (compared to ancient Greece): no slavery anymore (when we leave out some "quasi-slaves" in poor third world countries). At least not as base for our economy.
            Also: killing your children when you are poor is hardly neccessary in our (western) societies anymore. And I´d think women have more to say in modern Greece than in ancient times....

            Of course that doesn´t mean that everything today is nice....
            Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't slavery praticed today in a couple of African countries?

            And aren't impoverished prostitutes in Eastern Europe treated no better than slaves?

            By only pointing out the progress made in Western countries, we risk overlooking such problems in other parts of the world.
            A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: The Good life

              Originally posted by GePap
              So here I am to ask one of the really BIG questions: is there such a thing as the good life?
              You define what a good life for you is, then live it. If you think being a buddhist monk in Nepal to pursue spiritual enlightenment is the good life, go for it. If you think being a hedonist to satisfy your earthly cravings is living the good life, hey, it's your choice. If

              Originally posted by GePap
              Or we could keep the question more precise. For example; do you live a better life, than say, some neolithic hunter in the jungles? Why, or why not?
              Well yes, because I define it that way
              (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
              (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
              (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by MrFun
                Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't slavery praticed today in a couple of African countries?

                And aren't impoverished prostitutes in Eastern Europe treated no better than slaves?
                Therefore I used the term "quasi-slaves". And you may be right about prostitutes in Eastern Europe, but still slavery isn´t the major principle which runs the entire economy there (and these methods are often illegal, or at least half-legal). It doesn´t have the same dimension or economical importance as the slavery known from the ancient world. That doesn´t make these modern cases good, but it points IMO to a different view on those cases compared to ancient slavery.
                Blah

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by BeBro


                  Therefore I used the term "quasi-slaves". And you may be right about prostitutes in Eastern Europe, but still slavery isn´t the major principle which runs the entire economy there (and these methods are often illegal, or at least half-legal). It doesn´t have the same dimension or economical importance as the slavery known from the ancient world. That doesn´t make these modern cases good, but it points IMO to a different view on those cases compared to ancient slavery.
                  Isn't using the term "quasi-slaves" sugar-coating?

                  Would it be inaccurate to call it what it is -- slavery?
                  A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    I used it because it is not "officially" slavery. Sure this doesn´t help people in such situations, but this difference reflects how the majority of people even in those countries thinks about slavery (as not moral).
                    Blah

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Ummmm I don't think there is one 'good life' that can be applied to any collective people. I believe that something different works, for each person. For some, a simpler life, full of nature is what is best, while for others, the city life, surrounded by culture and friends is happiest. Still others find something completely different.
                      "mono has crazy flow and can rhyme words that shouldn't, like Eminem"
                      Drake Tungsten
                      "get contacts, get a haircut, get better clothes, and lose some weight"
                      Albert Speer

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        actually there is a major crack down on nations like Greece and Turkey because of their human trafficking.

                        Not all the humans being sold are prostitutes, others are used as slave labour or near slave labour. It was on CNN webpage a few days ago, I don't see it there now.

                        Sad to see so much human trafficking still going on.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by monolith94
                          Ummmm I don't think there is one 'good life' that can be applied to any collective people. I believe that something different works, for each person. For some, a simpler life, full of nature is what is best, while for others, the city life, surrounded by culture and friends is happiest. Still others find something completely different.


                          I don't think anyone can really dictate (even philosophically) for others what a good life would be for all people -- it's just not possible because of individuality.
                          A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by BeBro And I´d think women have more to say in modern Greece than in ancient times....



                            That's the problem.


























                            Actually some of the most educate people in ancient Greece was the Heteres. Erm, think concubines of very high standard.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              As for today's world I'd think that medical care, freedom and human conditions of life and employment for as many people as possible is a big achievement.

                              Also a big achievement is the human rights code that today is taken for granted but wasn't before. Colonialism etc.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by paiktis22
                                That's the problem.
                                Blah

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X