I've seen some references by some posters about countries such as Iraq and Vietnam. Some have claimed if things were actually bad in those countries the populace would revolt.
But is that possible? I don't think it is. I've been trying to come up with some modern revolutions and have been having trouble coming up with examples. Cuba for one. But that was 40 years ago. African nations still have revolutions and coups, but often the warlords have just as much firepower as the goverment.
In most countries in the world, the militias and warlords do not have nearly the amount of firepower than the goverment. Even in Afghanistan, they couldn't get the job done until the U.S. got involved with massive airpower. And yet there is still not complete control of the country.
Are revolutions possible in nations other than some African ones? The U.S. is another example. Second ammendment or not, revolution is not possible in the U.S.
But is that possible? I don't think it is. I've been trying to come up with some modern revolutions and have been having trouble coming up with examples. Cuba for one. But that was 40 years ago. African nations still have revolutions and coups, but often the warlords have just as much firepower as the goverment.
In most countries in the world, the militias and warlords do not have nearly the amount of firepower than the goverment. Even in Afghanistan, they couldn't get the job done until the U.S. got involved with massive airpower. And yet there is still not complete control of the country.
Are revolutions possible in nations other than some African ones? The U.S. is another example. Second ammendment or not, revolution is not possible in the U.S.
Comment