What News Sources Are Invalid Here?

[Solly]

We all know that America's Fox News and Britain's Guardian are not credible sources. I think we need to add the BBC to that. They can't have any credibility when half their reports are one-sentence-per-paragraph style.

Anywhere else that can just be laughed off?

[BeBMan]

All sources which disagree with my POV

[Cruddy]

All sources are biased. The trick is to reach across the spectrum (ie read a few different ones) to get an idea of going on.

If you only stick with one news source you are bound to be disappointed.

[Jaguar]

All but Mohammed Saheed al Sahiff.

[mrmitchell]

FOX, anything with the words "Conservative," "Family," etc. in it.

CNN makes a few blunders towards the right every now and then but it's pretty reliable IMO. Oddly I find CNBC to be a great source of nonbiased news media.

However, sources can be biased towards the left also--it's just that (1) they never try to actually hide it in my experience and (2) they don't carry as much readership.

EDIT: And you still haven't told me who your avatar chick is yet.

[Agathon]

Re: What News Sources Are Invalid Here?

Originally posted by Boddington's
We all know that America's Fox News and Britain's Guardian are not credible sources.

The Grauniad? What's not credible about it?

[Solly]

It's blatantly Lib Dem, the most extreme of Britain's three main parties.

[Jaguar]

I say the Washington Post and NBC are the two safe American sources. Don't know most of the international ones, but I think BBC is OK as well.

[*End Is Forever*]

The Guardian is terrible, but it's not really overtly party-political other than being strongly anti-Tory (though occasionally it doesn't quite manage it).

[*End Is Forever*]

Oh, and Stew, can you please drop the Liberal Democrat troll? It's annoying me and I can't stand the yellow scum.

[Cruddy]

Originally posted by Boddington's
It's blatantly Lib Dem, the most extreme of Britain's three main parties.

Blatantly middle of the road? How can that be biased?

Just because you don't like what it prints about your beloved Fuerher, you get all moody.

Stop causing mither.

[*End Is Forever*]

I wouldn't call the Liberal Democrats "middle of the road". In fact, given that their membership ranges from open Marxists to centre-right former Tories it's very difficult to think of anything to call them. Other than multiple-faced power-grabbing political prostitutes, of course.

[Jaguar]

Originally posted by *End Is Forever*
Oh, and Stew, can you please drop the Liberal Democrat troll? It's annoying me and I can't stand the yellow scum.

Ditto.

[Cruddy]

Originally posted by *End Is Forever*
I wouldn't call the Liberal Democrats "middle of the road". In fact, given that their membership ranges from open Marxists to centre-right former Tories it's very difficult to think of anything to call them. Other than multiple-faced power-grabbing political prostitutes, of course.

Yes, but with that broad range don't you end up with a moderate consensus? As for the last sentence, name me one MP that doesn't fit that description.

[DinoDoc]

The New York Times: "All the News that's we just made up and phoned in."