A right to refuse to teach known BNP members?

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

That's a "no" then. Thought so. Incidentally, the sky's falling down so you'd better go and tell the King.

[Solly]

You can't see the danger of letting all these extreme Islamists in?

[FrustratedPoet]

It can't be much more dangerous than letting other extreme groups like the BNP stay in the country.

[Solly]

BNP aren't extreme. There is nothing extreme about them now, nor will there ever be.

[Az]

BNP aren't extreme. There is nothing extreme about them now, nor will there ever be.

This is almost MSS-quese.

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

Originally posted by Boddington's
You can't see the danger of letting all these extreme Islamists in?

Which extreme Islamists? In your blanket condemnation of Asylum seekers, you've failed to clarify that.

[Solly]

I didn't say all were. Even if just 1% are (and are unidentifiable from the rest, which they usually are), it's a valid reason to send them all back.

Again, we'll see in years to come.

[chequita guevara]

Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui

how many left wing groups commit such attacks?

Are we counting Bader-Meinhoff gang and 17 November (the Greek terrorist group)?

IIRC, neither attacked minority groups. And Bader-Meinhoff wasn't actually a leftist group.

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

Originally posted by Boddington's
I didn't say all were. Even if just 1% are (and are unidentifiable from the rest, which they usually are), it's a valid reason to send them all back.

Again, we'll see in years to come.

You really don't think these things through do you? If you have blanket exclusion of asylum seekers, the only people you'll succeed in excluding are genuine asylum seekers.

Treat it as an exam question. Here we go- "Terrorists would never enter Britain as tourists because.....".

So where next? Ban all tourism to Britain? Even white people? Then ban all foreign vessels entering British waters, because cargo vessels and private yachts could carry dirty bombs or anthrax?

Perhaps we'd be safer from terrorism. Presuming you've been paying attention in those lectures and have a measure of common sense, what economic impact do you feel this would have on Britain?

These "national security" arguments against asylum seekers are great. You could park trucks in the holes in them.

[Solly]

The authorities will be able to check those coming legally into the nations as tourists.

[FrustratedPoet]

The authorities will be able to check those coming legally into the nations as tourists.

How is this different from checking those coming legally into the nations as asylum seekers?

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

Originally posted by Boddington's
The authorities will be able to check those coming legally into the nations as tourists.

Tourists outnumber asylum seekers by about 40 to 1. How do you suggest that miracle will be achieved?

[Solly]

By the fact that tourists arrive with their documents with them. By the fact that those documents can be checked. They can be tracked around the country.

Whereas asylum seekers sneak in and do not have documents.

[FrustratedPoet]

Whereas asylum seekers sneak in and do not have documents.

Sneak in? We've got huge detention centres full of them while they wait to have their applications processed. Any terrorist could hire a boat and land at some beach in the north of Scotland with very little chance of being detected. What makes you think that an active terrorist would apply for asylum in this country?

[Solly]

Sympathy vote from the raving libs.