Why Our Drug Laws Have Failed and What We Can Do About It: A Judicial Indictment of the War on Drugs
by James P. Gray
This author was on "Scarborough Country" on MSNBC tonight and he said there was 1 addict/1,000 people before federal prohibition began in 1914, and today, after decades of prohibition, we now have 15 addicts/1,000 people.
These numbers are new to me, I read addiction rates were comparable, not so lopsided. But trying to find out what addiction rates were in the late 19th and early 20th centuries is difficult.
The 15/1,000 sounds about right for today, that's about 4 million addicts. But the 1/1,000 ratio would mean there was only about 20,000 addicts in ~1900. Anyone know where I can find good data on pre-prohibition addoction rates? I suppose I can buy his book and look at his footnotes if all else fails...
Btw, after this author cited these numbers and the numbers in Holland, Scarborough ignored everything he said and ended the segment with a comment about how he lost someone because of drugs and that's why he thinks legalisation is mis-guided. The irony is, if this author is right, that Joe Scarborough may have lost that person because of drug prohibition.
by James P. Gray
This author was on "Scarborough Country" on MSNBC tonight and he said there was 1 addict/1,000 people before federal prohibition began in 1914, and today, after decades of prohibition, we now have 15 addicts/1,000 people.
These numbers are new to me, I read addiction rates were comparable, not so lopsided. But trying to find out what addiction rates were in the late 19th and early 20th centuries is difficult.
The 15/1,000 sounds about right for today, that's about 4 million addicts. But the 1/1,000 ratio would mean there was only about 20,000 addicts in ~1900. Anyone know where I can find good data on pre-prohibition addoction rates? I suppose I can buy his book and look at his footnotes if all else fails...
Btw, after this author cited these numbers and the numbers in Holland, Scarborough ignored everything he said and ended the segment with a comment about how he lost someone because of drugs and that's why he thinks legalisation is mis-guided. The irony is, if this author is right, that Joe Scarborough may have lost that person because of drug prohibition.
Comment