Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Quantum computer draws closer

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Quantum computer draws closer

    Quantum computer draws closer
    By Dr David Whitehouse
    BBC News Online science editor

    Scientists have "entangled" two sub-atomic particles separated by about a millimetre, a feat that might pave the way for powerful quantum computers in the future.

    When two particles are entangled they are somehow connected because the fate of one depends upon the other, no matter how far apart they are.
    Sounds weird - even Einstein never quite came to terms with it.

    Entangled particles may be useful to make logic circuits for computers that have a far greater capacity and speed than today's machines.

    Published in the journal Science, the results represent the latest advance in a broad scientific effort to apply properties of quantum physics to the creation of a new generation of supercomputers.

    Bothering Einstein

    Quantum entanglement (QE) describes the situation when the fates of two or more particles become bound together.

    A change in one entangled particle results in an instant change in the other particle, no matter how far away it is - even if it is at the opposite end of the Universe.

    Of course, it is not quite a simple as that. The phenomenon is linked in a deep way to the fundamental properties of matter and the nature of observing and measuring reality.

    It really bothered Einstein, especially since the concept that a change in one particle was somehow communicated to the other faster than the speed of light - nature's ultimate speed limit.

    He called it "spooky action at a distance".

    Speed limits

    He believed there was something profound in the phenomenon and that buried in its seeming absurdity lay something that could overthrow quantum mechanics - a successful theory of the way the Universe behaves on the atomic and sub-atomic level.

    Einstein was not alive when, in the 1970's, physicist Alan Aspect carried out an experiment that showed QE was real and could form the basis for the computers, not of tomorrow, but of the day after.

    Today's computers are limited by the speed of electrons as they move around integrated circuits.

    In the future, computers that use light instead of electrons will be faster as they will be limited by the speed of light passing through crystals. But even lightspeed may be supplanted.

    Best yet

    According to some, a computer based on quantum entanglement would not be bound by those limits as it would use "spooky action at a distance" instead of electrons or photons.

    A quantum computer would have to "entangle" quantum bits - or qubits - over significant distances. However, particle entanglement has only been observed on the micrometre (millionth of a metre) scale so far.

    Now, Andrew Berkley and colleagues from the University of Maryland, US, have entangled two qubits inside a silicon chip over a distance of 0.7 millimetres - a thousand times greater.

    A millimetre does not sound like the opposite ends of the Universe but it is significantly closer to the scale needed to build quantum mechanical computer components.

    "Entanglement is essential to quantum computing because it is the linked quality that builds more information into quantum bits than is possible with classical computing bits," says Andrew Berkley.

    "Our current findings, which build on the work of many others, moves us further along the road towards a quantum computer," he adds.


    Story from BBC NEWS:
    BBC, News, BBC News, news online, world, uk, international, foreign, british, online, service


    Published: 2003/05/21 19:29:25 GMT
    Interesting. I wasn't aware that Quantum particles and their effects were faster than light. I'm glad to see the speed of light isn't such a limit as Einstein proposed. Now... I must ask... WHEN AM I GETTING MY QUANTUM COMPUTER!?

    To us, it is the BEAST.

  • #2
    Sinclair made one in the late 80's (in name only) ;O)

    Comment


    • #3
      Boggles the mind.

      When two particles are entangled they are somehow connected because the fate of one depends upon the other, no matter how far apart they are.
      I do love it when scientists use words like things and stuff, but fate? That's a new one...
      Monkey!!!

      Comment


      • #4
        This stuff is eons away from a computer.


        when it actually calculates something, call me.
        urgh.NSFW

        Comment


        • #5
          Hmm... I think Azazel is right, this is a long way from a production line.

          On the bright side, light induced switches are being well researched.

          I don't think we'll see a quantum PC in the next 30 years, but a photonic one might happen in that time frame. The tricky bit is going to be evolving RAM that works at those speeds. And of course, it's going to be mainframe first.
          Some cry `Allah O Akbar` in the street. And some carry Allah in their heart.
          "The CIA does nothing, says nothing, allows nothing, unless its own interests are served. They are the biggest assembly of liars and theives this country ever put under one roof and they are an abomination" Deputy COS (Intel) US Army 1981-84

          Comment


          • #6
            Actually, scientists built a quantum computer that added two numbers together, I think 5 and 7.

            Comment


            • #7
              I can't wait for the kind of porn that will be on Quantum computers!
              To us, it is the BEAST.

              Comment


              • #8
                It wouldn't be any different

                The first applications of quantum computers would be codebreaking. Their strength is their ability to fall into the right solution, rather than evaluate every possible solution sequentially.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by skywalker
                  Actually, scientists built a quantum computer that added two numbers together, I think 5 and 7.
                  I read something about that a few weeks ago...
                  RIAA sucks
                  The Optimistas
                  I'm a political cartoonist

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    It wouldn't be any different
                    I think the technological improvements would allow higher resolutions and holographic presentations of porn... that would definitely be better spank material!
                    To us, it is the BEAST.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Cruddy
                      Hmm... I think Azazel is right, this is a long way from a production line.
                      Back in the late '80s I was interviewed for a job with an "Xray lithography" group, The short wavelengths would make thinner circuits, but short wavelengths means higher energy, which can destroy the silicon substrate. To my knowledge, today's state of the art is soft ultraviolet.

                      Also, fusion was said to be 10 years away since the 50's, and and AI program which called itself "The General Problem Solver" was attempted in the '50s.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by skywalker
                        It wouldn't be any different

                        The first applications of quantum computers would be codebreaking. Their strength is their ability to fall into the right solution, rather than evaluate every possible solution sequentially.
                        i think he meant downloading it
                        :-p

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Downloading and quality
                          To us, it is the BEAST.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Quantum computers have also factored 15.
                            "Chemistry is a class you take in high school or college, where you figure out two plus two is 10, or something."
                            - Dennis Rodman, NBA Basketball player, on Chicago Bull's team chemistry being overrated

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Fusion exists. We're just too afraid to spend the money to make it feasible. We've operated fusion reactors without monstrously bad things happening.
                              Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
                              "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X