Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Geeeeometry (Help!)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Geeeeometry (Help!)

    Most of you are probably familiar with the Pythagorean Theorem. In a right triangle, a² + b² = c²

    I need the most simple way to prove it. Does anybody know?

  • #2
    I know but i'm too lazy to write it in English.
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master" - Commissioner Pravin Lal.

    Comment


    • #3
      But...


      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master" - Commissioner Pravin Lal.

      Comment


      • #4
        Thanks Eli, I think the second link will be most helpful, I'll go have a look at it.

        I just have to figure out what "perpendicular" means.

        Comment


        • #5
          At right-angle to.
          I'm building a wagon! On some other part of the internets, obviously (but not that other site).

          Comment


          • #6
            I think you can start bt the Cosine Rule and work it as a special case.

            Cosine Rule: a2 = b2 + c2 - 2bc*cos A

            A = 90°
            cos(A) = 0

            Q.E.D.

            (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
            (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
            (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

            Comment


            • #7
              Thanks guys. Learning, learning.

              Comment


              • #8
                if you can get your hands on the book 'Fermats Last Theorem' theres a (proper) proof in the appendics of that (my copy is at work)

                Comment


                • #9
                  I remember that once an Applet proving the Pythagorean Theorem won a Sun Contest, i was unable to find it, anyway the following seems to me well done too.



                  Obviously you need a Java-enabled browser, just try the link, if it starts you have it

                  P.S. No, i found it, it's here:

                  "If it works, it's obsolete."
                  -- Marshall McLuhan

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Urban Ranger
                    I think you can start bt the Cosine Rule and work it as a special case.
                    Yeah, but then you have to prove the Cosine Rule.

                    Although there is a trigonometrical proof somewhere...

                    I like Angelo's first one the best. I think that is the one Pythag himself used.
                    Concrete, Abstract, or Squoingy?
                    "I don't believe in giving scripting languages because the only additional power they give users is the power to create bugs." - Mike Breitkreutz, Firaxis

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Stephen Hawkings did a good proof of it in the Brief History of Time.
                      Monkey!!!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Immortal Wombat
                        Yeah, but then you have to prove the Cosine Rule.
                        Well, you could, but you're not asked to do it.
                        (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
                        (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
                        (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          The area of the large square can be found in two ways:

                          1) Area of large square = (x+y)^2


                          2) Measure each element in the large square. The area of each triangle is 0.5xy. The area of the tilted square is z^2

                          Area of large square = 4*(area of each triangle)+ area of tilted square

                          = 4 (0.5xy)+z^2

                          1) and 2) give different expressions but must be equivilent because the represent the same area

                          so (x+y)^2 = 4(0.5xy)+z^2

                          = x^2+y^2+2xy = 2xy+z^2

                          = x^2+y^2+z^2 which is the theorem.
                          Attached Files

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            or you could just make a right triangle that's 3x4x5
                            "Chegitz, still angry about the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991?
                            You provide no source. You PROVIDE NOTHING! And yet you want to destroy capitalism.. you criminal..." - Fez

                            "I was hoping for a Communist utopia that would last forever." - Imran Siddiqui

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              something a humanities major would say.
                              urgh.NSFW

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X