Many things that should be banned

[notyoueither]

Originally posted by King of Rasslin
Sorry Q, but I claimed the title of Universal Dictator before you.

Stupidity shouldn't be banned, since the stupid people will be the ones to support me.

You sound very far right.

If you were left it would be those you consider smart supporting you, and those you consider stupid opposed. Of course, I think it is very relative for them.

Of course rightists do this too a bit, just doesn't seem as much as those from the left.

[Nubclear]

Shirtless fat men.
Fat women in bikinis.
Old men jogging in the city wearing rubber-duck shorts.

All of which I had the unfortunate luck of seeing today

[Nubclear]

Originally posted by notyoueither


You sound very far right.

If you were left it would be those you consider smart supporting you, and those you consider stupid opposed. Of course, I think it is very relative for them.

Of course rightists do this too a bit, just doesn't seem as much as those from the left.

Rightists dont think their position is smart and the other position is stupid as much as leftists do?

[notyoueither]

Not the position, Tass. The people.

I notice it very often that the left will slander and demonise an opponent out of all proportion to reality. Yes, rightists will do this too, but not as often that I have observed. Of course this is my observation, not the result of any study or what-not.

[Skanky Burns]

I think this thread should be banned.

[orange]

Shirtless fat men.
Fat women in bikinis.
Old men jogging in the city wearing rubber-duck shorts.

All of which I had the unfortunate luck of seeing today

Ah, the joy that is living in Utah

[Nubclear]

Originally posted by orange


Ah, the joy that is living in Utah

It's odd, because Mormons don't like showing "excessive skin" in cities.

[Narz]

Originally posted by Q Cubed
...
#3. Anybody who is socially inept.
...

You mean online or in the real world?

Originally posted by Q Cubed
...
#4. Anybody who chooses to remain steadfastly ignorant when presented with evidence to the contrary.
...

All the world's cigarette smokers should all be deported to a small island way out in the Pacific. We should ship with them one handgun (all conficasted from the city streets) per person but only half a pack of smokes each. This ought to slow down overpopulation, save many trees and make it an easier world to take a deep breath. Also it would create an interesting new nation of survivors with a unique story to tell.

- Narz

[Q Classic]

You mean online or in the real world?

yes.

[Zero]

-ugly people
-and people who wont accept my absolute overignty in dictatorship


I would also be in favor of all those banning drugs proposal. Banned them and ship them over to my house and I will take care of the disposal for free!

[Urban Ranger]

Re: Many things that should be banned

Originally posted by King of Rasslin
#6. Flowers.

Flowers? You want to ban flowers? Off with your head!

[Narz]

Oh yeah, that reminds me : fake plants. They should definitely be banned. Owning fake plants signifies wanting to look good while actually being fake & dead inside. It also shows a fear of death and an incapacity to handle life.

[Dr Strangelove]

Originally posted by Narz
Oh yeah, that reminds me : fake plants. They should definitely be banned. Owning fake plants signifies wanting to look good while actually being fake & dead inside. It also shows a fear of death and an incapacity to handle life.

....or it could show that the owner has multiple allergies to pollens. People with allergies however should either learn to put up with the symptoms or be forced to forgo the pleasure of the beuty of flowering plants.

The next time your flowers are blooming Narz let me drop by. Please remember to wear waterproof clothing.

[Odin]

I hate fake plants! I prefer life, thank you. I would shoot the person who bans flowers!

[Kassiopeia]

Re: Many things that should be banned

Originally posted by King of Rasslin
I think drugs are what are ruining the modern world and America. If there were no drugs, there would almost be no terrorism or murder. However, many things that aren't considered "drugs" have been proven to change brain chemistry and have a phychological reaction.

Why not go to directly to the source of all that is evil in humans and ban all emotions? I mean, banning flowers is a step in that direction, but not enough by a mile. Pumping people full of the right chemical should make them mindless and emotion-free slaves, eh?

(Yes, I've seen Equilibrium.)