Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

American/European dates?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • American/European dates?

    No, I'm not talking about "you just met a girl/guy, you'd like to date"

    I'm talking about the differences in how dates are written:

    In Denmark (and other European countries), we write our dates with dd-mm-yyyy (d = day, m = month... you get the idea ), while in America (and probably other countries too), they write their dates in some completely different way... I think it's yyyy-mm-dd, but sometimes I also see it like mm-dd-yyyy...

    This has annoyed me pretty much lately, since I'm doing my first examen project for school, where we should do the programming our-self. One of the worst hurdles we had, was this date thing... it was pretty diffecult to get it working, because we were programming our program on an english OS, with english apps and such, but the program should be designed to danes (meaning: we should be sure to use danish dates). It took us ages to find some way, to make this program work... though I believe this program wont work on danish computers, because we wrote the program to english computers... (None of our teachers knew how to get rid of this 'date' problem...)

    I think this is pretty annoying, and believe it should be changed. I see a problem, when talking to Americans, and talking about e.g. "let's talk again this date", and then they give some date e.g. "05-04-03"... I know I'm not always aware of this problem, so I could easily see this as April 5th 2003, while others see this as May 4th 2003

    Should this be changed? If so: Who should change?
    58
    dd-mm-yy
    51.72%
    30
    mm-dd-yy
    13.79%
    8
    yy-mm-dd
    17.24%
    10
    yy-dd-mm
    3.45%
    2
    Some not mentioned above...
    0.00%
    0
    Each country should use whatever they prefer to use...
    5.17%
    3
    Who cares?
    1.72%
    1
    bb-aa-nn-aa-nn-aa
    6.90%
    4
    This space is empty... or is it?

  • #2
    You may as well have just had a poll asking who is European and who is American, because all the Euros will vote for dd-mm-yy and all the Ameris mm-dd-yy.

    Comment


    • #3
      Day-Month-Year. Logical sense as it's the smallest unit ascending to the largest unit.
      Exult in your existence, because that very process has blundered unwittingly on its own negation. Only a small, local negation, to be sure: only one species, and only a minority of that species; but there lies hope. [...] Stand tall, Bipedal Ape. The shark may outswim you, the cheetah outrun you, the swift outfly you, the capuchin outclimb you, the elephant outpower you, the redwood outlast you. But you have the biggest gifts of all: the gift of understanding the ruthlessly cruel process that gave us all existence [and the] gift of revulsion against its implications.
      -Richard Dawkins

      Comment


      • #4
        dd-mm-yyyy. dd-mm-yyyy. Damn, that doesn't make much of a chant, now does it?

        Hm. deedee-emem-waiwaiwaiwai. deedee-emem-waiwaiwaiwai. It does, actually.
        "Spirit merges with matter to sanctify the universe. Matter transcends to return to spirit. The interchangeability of matter and spirit means the starlit magic of the outermost life of our universe becomes the soul-light magic of the innermost life of our self." - Dennis Kucinich, candidate for the U. S. presidency
        "That’s the future of the Democratic Party: providing Republicans with a number of cute (but not that bright) comfort women." - Adam Yoshida, Canada's gift to the world

        Comment


        • #5
          The problem is how they're read.

          mm-dd-yy makes more sense for Americans because days are described as, say "April 1st, 2003" rather than "1 April, 2003", which sounds just...ridiculous.
          "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
          Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

          Comment


          • #6
            Month-day-year.
            Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

            Comment


            • #7
              In what way does "1st of April, 2003" sound any more ridiculous than "April 1st, 2003"?
              Exult in your existence, because that very process has blundered unwittingly on its own negation. Only a small, local negation, to be sure: only one species, and only a minority of that species; but there lies hope. [...] Stand tall, Bipedal Ape. The shark may outswim you, the cheetah outrun you, the swift outfly you, the capuchin outclimb you, the elephant outpower you, the redwood outlast you. But you have the biggest gifts of all: the gift of understanding the ruthlessly cruel process that gave us all existence [and the] gift of revulsion against its implications.
              -Richard Dawkins

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Rogan Josh
                You may as well have just had a poll asking who is European and who is American, because all the Euros will vote for dd-mm-yy and all the Ameris mm-dd-yy.
                Not necessary... I was close on voting mm-dd-yy, because I often talk to not-European people anyway... so I kinda got used to the other thing anyway...
                This space is empty... or is it?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Asher
                  The problem is how they're read.

                  mm-dd-yy makes more sense for Americans because days are described as, say "April 1st, 2003" rather than "1 April, 2003", which sounds just...ridiculous.
                  I agree with the slut here
                  "Yay Apoc!!!!!!!" - bipolarbear
                  "At least there were some thoughts went into Apocalypse." - Urban Ranger
                  "Apocalype was a great game." - DrSpike
                  "In Apoc, I had one soldier who lasted through the entire game... was pretty cool. I like apoc for that reason, the soldiers are a bit more 'personal'." - General Ludd

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Yep, in durch you 1 april, 2003, doesn't sound too foolish to me
                    Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
                    Then why call him God? - Epicurus

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I prefer dd-mm-yyyy in general and common use such as dating letters.

                      yyyy-mm-dd is more useful when archiving, referencing or other somesuch.
                      One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        yyyy-mm-dd should be the norm in anything that demands precision (such as a program, archives, etc). It is the most rational way by far.
                        For the daily use of dates, I think people should stick to whatever they're used to. When I'm talking on 'Poly (i.e to Yanks and Euros), I say dates in full letters anyway, for everybody to understand.
                        "I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
                        "I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
                        "I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Okay...monarchs. We have Charles I, Elizabeth II, Louis XIV. Not 1st Charles, 2nd Elizabeth, 14th Louis.

                          World Wars. We have World War I and World War II, not 1st of World Wars and Second of World Wars (yeah, some historians call it "the first world war" to sound special, but that doesn't count)

                          Movie sequels. We have Rocky II, Star Wars IV, not 2nd of Rocky, 4th of Star Wars.

                          Fighter jets...we have the F-14, F-15, F-16. Not the 14-F, 15-F, 16-F.

                          I could go on....but...you say the thing first, and then the number that it uses. That's just the natural way to do things. Why do those crazy Europeans insist on just messing it up for dates?
                          "Although I may disagree with what you say, I will defend to the death your right to hear me tell you how wrong you are."

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            yyyy-mm-dd makes the most sense. First the most significant unit, then the lower. We also don't say, that it's 28 minutes, 35 seconds of the 11th hour, do we?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Giant_Squid
                              World Wars. We have World War I and World War II, not 1st of World Wars and Second of World Wars (yeah, some historians call it "the first world war" to sound special, but that doesn't count)
                              Actually, both in German and Russian "First World War and Second World War" are the right order of words. Besides, I don't see what this has to do with dates.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X