Tweet
Originally posted by Lancer
More people are watching FOX than are watching CNN.
Read em and weep.
More people are watching FOX than are watching CNN.
Read em and weep.
-
Yeah well, didn't you guys used the "majority isn't right" argument a lot before? Looks like it's turning around and biting you in the arse.
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within." -
wow lancer, that means there america must have a lot of idiots."I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburgerComment
-
Good, keep weepin'
Long time member @ Apolyton
Civilization player since the dawn of timeComment
-
Imran is correct, they do often throw in editorial segments at the end of their news. NBC has fleecing of America, ABC has John Stossel, and CBS has Andy Rooney"I'm moving to the Left" - Lancer
"I imagine the neighbors on your right are estatic." - SlowwhandComment
-
yeah, thats what im doing jackass. you can continue to keep getting mentally sodomized by a network that tells you what you want to hear."I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburgerComment
-
Shi didn't deserve THAT!
Long time member @ Apolyton
Civilization player since the dawn of timeComment
-
I thought his remarks were right on target. He expressed an opinion in an opinion segment. Still haven't seen you attacking CNN for blatant pandering to Saddam (pulling news stories and the like from reprisal fears). Just see the usual arch nose-looking down crap.Originally posted by HershOstropoler
Yes. Nothing funnier than a sissy with a temper.
You showed me you were full of **** with your Bagdhad thread.
You're just still pissy that we won and that the Iraqi people loved it.Comment
-
Oh...and by the way, the dumb "I'm a troll and I like to look superior for someone else reacting to something" is passe.Comment
-
Does Cavuto even do a regular news hosting? Or does he run the business news "magazine"?Comment
-
No Bush! No Saddam! Yes yes for Islam!Originally posted by GP
You're just still pissy that we won and that the Iraqi people loved it.Comment
-
George! Where have you been!?
"I thought his remarks were right on target."
That Cavuto guy is a clown. No more to say.
"Still haven't seen you attacking CNN for blatant pandering to Saddam (pulling news stories and the like from reprisal fears)."
Yes, CNN sucks. Many ways - like pandering to Bush, by eliminating critical passages from a Blix report on their website. Please.
There isn't much difference between CNN or Fox. It's funny how you can get so excited about it. Both are jingoistic and crappy. Fox is just more blatant about it.
"You showed me you were full of **** with your Bagdhad thread."
Oh, did I hurt your nationalist feelings? I could say you're full of it for your inspirational story thread. Just accept that your pro-US bias is just that, a bias, not objective.
"You're just still pissy that we won and that the Iraqi people loved it."
Darling, hate to break this to you, but you've won nothing and are on track of losing more. The Iraqis love you so much that Mr Garner had to be removed from the country, for fear of being loved to death, I presume?“Now we declare… that the law-making power or the first and real effective source of law is the people or the body of citizens or the prevailing part of the people according to its election or its will expressed in general convention by vote, commanding or deciding that something be done or omitted in regard to human civil acts under penalty or temporal punishment….” (Marsilius of Padua, „Defensor Pacis“, AD 1324)Comment
-
They should also have some sort of on-screen icon and/or words indicating that the segment is editorializing, in case a viewer comes upon the ranting and raving while flipping through the channels.Originally posted by Oerdin
As long as they come out and tell you "This segment is an editorial" then I don't have a problem with it ...
Either that or the few solid cable news programs should stick with news and let their commentator and talk-show brethren (which dominate cable anyway) do the editorializing instead of the anchor(s) spouting off.
Gatekeeper"I may not agree with what you have to say, but I'll die defending your right to say it." — Voltaire
"Wheresoever you go, go with all your heart." — ConfuciusComment
-
Nah, I acknowledge that most conservatives are to my left as well, but the fact they have more in common with liberals than the Founders hardly indicates they are right wing.Don't mind him. He thinks anyone to the left of him economically (ie, just about everyone) is a liberal.
Comment
-
Berzerker, so your position is that since conservatives in the year 2003 has more in common with liberals living in the year 2003 than the founding fathers who lived in 1774, that defines their ideology?
What about me then? I have significantly more in common with modern social democrats than I have with king Gustav III - does that make m a socialist? I sincerely hope not, since I left the bloody country to escape the socialists...
Anyway, the point is that you can't really define the ideology by 230 year old standards (unless you interpret "conservative" literally, in which case you can't juxtaposition it with "liberal" anyway).Gnu Ex Machina - the Gnu in the MachineComment
-
Tell that to Lancer and Slowwhand.Originally posted by GP
Oh...and by the way, the dumb "I'm a troll and I like to look superior for someone else reacting to something" is passe.(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."Comment
Comment