Hey Matt! Where have you been? How are you doin'?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I've been indicted on multiple charges!
Collapse
X
-
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
-
Korn: How old are/were you when this relationship occured?Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GP
Euros why not at first menstruation? Or before, if consensual? We could eliminate babies or toddlers since they don't really reason yet. But the average 10 year old is pretty bright...
If the person has reached the age the law has decided the mental capacity to give consent kicks in at, then the person they screw is not committing a crime. The kid might be violating his parents' wishes by doing it, but that shouldn't have to be the concern of the kid's sexual partner. See above for movie example.
Reason contract analogy is flawed is that 18 is age where reason for money matters kicks in, as far as the law is concerned. Contracts are part of that, as is necessity for person to feed and clothe themselves.
There is no such obvious connection to sexual decision-making.12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
i.e. if the kid's parents don't want him having sex, ground him. Statutory rape is supposed to apply where consent cannot be given due to inability of the victim to give consent. Has nothing to do with parents' wishes.
Same reason a parent can't sell his child's services in pornographic films or use them for their own sexual gratification.12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
Originally posted by Urban Ranger
Hey Matt! Where have you been? How are you doin'?12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
Originally posted by Frogger
A 10 year-old can't reason about sex the same way a 16 year-old can.
If the person has reached the age the law has decided the mental capacity to give consent kicks in at, then the person they screw is not committing a crime. The kid might be violating his parents' wishes by doing it, but that shouldn't have to be the concern of the kid's sexual partner. See above for movie example.
Reason contract analogy is flawed is that 18 is age where reason for money matters kicks in, as far as the law is concerned. Contracts are part of that, as is necessity for person to feed and clothe themselves.
There is no such obvious connection to sexual decision-making.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GP
Well if you can reason for sex why can't you reason for dollars?12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
Originally posted by GP
The last few 16 year old girls I met, seemed pretty childish to me.
The question is where a normative line can be drawn on one side of which is consensual sex and on the other side of which is rape.
Remember that this isn't about the parents' say-so. It's about what's victimisation and what's not.12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
Originally posted by Frogger
So are most 18 year-olds (girls or boys).
The question is where a normative line can be drawn on one side of which is consensual sex and on the other side of which is rape.
Remember that this isn't about the parents' say-so. It's about what's victimisation and what's not.
Comment
-
Because of situations like korn's.
Statutory rape at 17 is just a way for parents to control their kids, not a protection for said kid. They already have legal guardianship over them, which means they can tell them where to go, who to see etc. Just because your kid doesn't listen to you is no excuse for a ****ty law like that.
Anyhoo...12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
BTW, I know a girl who was 13 and ****ed a 21 year-old guy. That's rape. I feel it in my gut, and it makes me angry to think about it.
Having a 17 year-old's parents scream rape is pathetic in comparison.12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
Originally posted by Agathon
Of course there is a real difference. The rate of sexual exploitation of minors by men is far greater than the sexual exploitation of minors by women. In many of the latter cases it is the male who initiates the activity. It is also the case that most 14-16 year old males would relaish the opportunity to copulate with an attractive older woman (or with one their own age for that matter). As I said above, if an attractive woman in her mid twenties had wanted to use me for meaningless sex when I was 16 I would have thought I'd died and gone to heaven. While it's true that both genders can suffer from being with older people, females tend to suffer more. Presumably there is some psychological basis for this.
Originally posted by Agathon
Tell me, in your city is there a problem with 40ish women cruising the streets in cars looking for 14 year old girls to abuse?
He's got the Midas touch.
But he touched it too much!
Hey Goldmember, Hey Goldmember!
Comment
Comment