Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why the US and coalition should declare victory in Iraq...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Lancer
    GePap, yes I know about Universal. I do watch their stuff if it comes on TV, but I would not rent it or buy it or go to the movies to see a film made by Universal.
    So basically you support putting thousand of Americans out of work because their corporation was bought by the French...wow, you are a true Patriot! I say more Americans need to loose thier jobs thanks to people like you!

    And while we are at it, lets end the global financial markets and put up huge trade barriers so that dirty French capital doesn't infect our shores!!

    If you don't like reality, change it! me
    "Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
    "it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
    "Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw

    Comment


    • #17
      GePap, I'm not for the trade barriers that you suggest.

      Also, do you honestly believe that thousands of Americans will lose their jobs because I and a few others stop watching movies made by Universal? I would be happy if Universal lost value and was sold off to a non French buyer at dirt cheap prices.
      Long time member @ Apolyton
      Civilization player since the dawn of time

      Comment


      • #18
        Declaring an end to hostilities doesn't require a release of all prisoners, and a lot of POW's have already been released. Prisoners who are held for suspected war crimes or other reasons may be detained well beyond declaring an end to hostilities.

        The problem is that once you do declare an end to hostilities, all sorts of pesky, inconvenient international law obligations are triggered - things like the fact you have no authority to set up a form of government, you have no authority to make up or issue a constitution or to change the structure of government, stuff like that. Oh, and occupying powers obligations.

        There's all sorts of inconvenience in "declaring victory" because then you have to start getting the **** out and letting the locals run their country as they see fit. (remember folks, it's their country, not yours. )

        So keeping a pretense of war going on when you have limited civil resistance allows you to do anything, and cynically claim that you don't have many of those international law obligations that so unfortunately "limiting."
        When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

        Comment


        • #19
          When you refuse to state exactly what it is you intend to accomplish, it's impossible to determine whether you succeeded or not.

          Democratic, stable government in Iraq (and we know what a high priority that was )? Might be years away, if ever.

          Those WMD? Jury's still out.

          Eliminate terrorist threat? Remains to be seen.

          Eliminate Iraqi "threat" to neighbors? With an army that wasn't capable of mounting a coherent defense of its own country? Some threat.

          Bring Saddam to justice? Yeah, right.

          The Bush administration gave so many reasons to justify the attack that at least some of them must have been accomplished, but that doesn't necessarily translate into "victory."

          To ask the most important question in a capitalist order, what's in it for me? Aside from massively greater deficits and domestic assaults against civil liberties, I don't see that I've gained much by this "vistory."

          Of course, there was one pretext for war that was vigorously denied: Gain control of Iraqi oil. Hmmmm....
          "When all else fails, a pigheaded refusal to look facts in the face will see us through." -- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay Melchett

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Agathon


            In other words they just want an open licence to arrest and detain people for whatever reason they seem fit.

            Kick them out of the UN I say.
            Exactly. Those poor little murderers. We really should protect them. It is probably better to let the UN handle things. They did such a good job in Bosnia. We sure don't want the bad ole USA going around and preventing the terrorist their right to free access to come and fly planes into buildings.

            Oh and please, Please, PLEASE let us stay in the UN. It means soooooo much to us. Such a worthwhile organization.
            "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by PLATO1003


              Exactly. Those poor little murderers. We really should protect them. It is probably better to let the UN handle things. They did such a good job in Bosnia. We sure don't want the bad ole USA going around and preventing the terrorist their right to free access to come and fly planes into buildings.

              Oh and please, Please, PLEASE let us stay in the UN. It means soooooo much to us. Such a worthwhile organization.
              Eat my smiley attack
              Eventis is the only refuge of the spammer. Join us now.
              Long live teh paranoia smiley!

              Comment


              • #22
                "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

                Comment

                Working...
                X