The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Test: which moral philosophy is yours (even if you don't know it)
Plato seems distinclty unpopular here, besides with ....you.
Thinking about Philosopher kings, aren't we Agathon?
If you don't like reality, change it! me
"Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
"it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
"Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw
It's quite a shoddily-designed test. Too much metaethics (which most philosophers, at least in this selection, only dealt with as a side issue), too few questions about how the mechanics of moral law-making is supposed to function. They do some sort of half-arsed attempts to hide blatant questions about specific philosopher in a general guise (I'm sure that "libery vs. society" question is really "do you agree with the utilitarians or not?"), they should have gone full-steam-ahead and presented longer, more complex models of each stage like they did with the religion test.
Where are the arguments and proofs? I mean Homer and Hesiod have views about the way the world is, but they aren't philosophers.
The best case for the Oriental thinkers is that they are on a par with the early pre-Parmenidean philosophers. And that's pushing it because those guys were scientific reductionists.
Originally posted by Buck Birdseed
It's quite a shoddily-designed test. Too much metaethics (which most philosophers, at least in this selection, only dealt with as a side issue), too few questions about how the mechanics of moral law-making is supposed to function. They do some sort of half-arsed attempts to hide blatant questions about specific philosopher in a general guise (I'm sure that "libery vs. society" question is really "do you agree with the utilitarians or not?"), they should have gone full-steam-ahead and presented longer, more complex models of each stage like they did with the religion test.
I disagree. I think that metaethics is the way to go. All these philosophers had metaethical views which informed their normative views. If you want to know the similarities re: philosophy (i.e. the way you think about morality, rather than your values), it is a good test.
Most of the disagreement on this forum occurs because of differences in metaethical views anyway.
When did proofs become an integral part of philosophy? That's a distinctly Western concept, so I don't see why Eastern philosophy would incorporate it.
Confucianism, Daoism and Buddhism all qualify as philosophies in my view. Maybe you disagree, but claiming that they aren't "philosophy" just because they don't follow Western thought patterns doesn't fly.
KH FOR OWNER! ASHER FOR CEO!! GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!
The founder of utilitarianism and designer of strange prisons. You can look at him if you visit the University of London since his embalmed body is still on display.
Here he is.
When I was there (University College, London) I heard the story about how his head was used as a rugby ball by one of the other colleges.
My #1 was Kant.
One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.
You like Plato? You some sort of ****ing fascist or something?
Accusations of fascism against Plato are deeply unfair for a few reasons.
1) It isn't clear that the Republic is supposed to be a blueprint for a feasible society. The text doesn't unequivocally support this.
2) In the later works the Statesman and the Laws, things are toned down quite a bit. The Laws is supposed to be a blueprint for a society.
3) Plato had been witness to a massive failure of a democratic state when it was beaten by an authoritarian regime. This had to affect his views.
4) Late Platonic legislation depends on the idea that the prospective inhabitants of the state to be constructed share little in the way of norms or customs.
1. Aquinas (100%)
Browse Aquinas related books. Click here for info
2. St. Augustine (79%)
Browse St. Augustine related books. Click here for info
3. Aristotle (67%)
Browse Aristotle related books. Click here for info
4. Spinoza (65%)
Browse Spinoza related books. Click here for info
5. Ockham (62%)
Browse Ockham related books. Click here for info
6. Plato (53%)
Browse Plato related books. Click here for info
7. Jeremy Bentham (52%)
Browse Jeremy Bentham related books. Click here for info
8. Epicureans (48%)
Browse Epicureans related books. Click here for info
9. Nietzsche (46%)
Browse Nietzsche related books. Click here for info
10. John Stuart Mill (44%)
Browse John Stuart Mill related books. Click here for info
11. Stoics (43%)
Browse Stoics related books. Click here for info
12. Ayn Rand (40%)
Browse Ayn Rand related books. Click here for info
13. Nel Noddings (36%)
Browse Nel Noddings related books. Click here for info
14. Cynics (36%)
Browse Cynics related books. Click here for info
15. Kant (33%)
Browse Kant related books. Click here for info
16. Jean-Paul Sartre (32%)
Browse Jean-Paul Sartre related books. Click here for info
17. David Hume (28%)
Browse David Hume related books. Click here for info
18. Prescriptivism (28%)
Browse Prescriptivism related books. Click here for info
19. Thomas Hobbes (12%)
Browse Thomas Hobbes related books. Click here for info
Jon Miller- I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
When did proofs become an integral part of philosophy? That's a distinctly Western concept, so I don't see why Eastern philosophy would incorporate it.
Proofs became an integral part of western philosophy after the publication of Parmenides' poem.
Philosophy or Philosophia in Greek is a word coined to describe what these people were doing. The rest of western philosophy is historically and conceptually related to what these people did. Philosophy is a western concept, unless these other people match up in an interesting way with the norms of this tradition, it isn't fair to call them philosophers.
Are you kidding? I've read The Republic from cover to cover and Plato's idea of the ideal society sickens me.
Presumably you skipped the bit where Socrates says that the city described in the Republic is "an image laid up in heaven" - a paradigm of justice. Plato was well aware that this wasn't a feasible scheme. That's why he wrote the Statesman and the Laws.
Comment