Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Test: which moral philosophy is yours (even if you don't know it)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by GePap

    How did you misquote Imran in your quote Agathon? That's just weird.
    My guess is that he edited his post after I quoted it. Either that or the Apolyton server is a friend of Bentham's.
    Only feebs vote.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Agathon


      No - that is very bad.
      Plato seems distinclty unpopular here, besides with ....you.

      Thinking about Philosopher kings, aren't we Agathon?
      If you don't like reality, change it! me
      "Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
      "it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
      "Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw

      Comment


      • #33
        It's quite a shoddily-designed test. Too much metaethics (which most philosophers, at least in this selection, only dealt with as a side issue), too few questions about how the mechanics of moral law-making is supposed to function. They do some sort of half-arsed attempts to hide blatant questions about specific philosopher in a general guise (I'm sure that "libery vs. society" question is really "do you agree with the utilitarians or not?"), they should have gone full-steam-ahead and presented longer, more complex models of each stage like they did with the religion test.
        Världsstad - Dom lokala genrenas vän
        Mick102, 102,3 Umeå, Måndagar 20-21

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
          But it isn't philosophy.


          I would disagree strongly.
          Where are the arguments and proofs? I mean Homer and Hesiod have views about the way the world is, but they aren't philosophers.

          The best case for the Oriental thinkers is that they are on a par with the early pre-Parmenidean philosophers. And that's pushing it because those guys were scientific reductionists.
          Only feebs vote.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Agathon


            No - that is very bad.
            You like Plato? You some sort of ****ing fascist or something?
            Världsstad - Dom lokala genrenas vän
            Mick102, 102,3 Umeå, Måndagar 20-21

            Comment


            • #36
              1. St. Augustine (100%)
              2. Aquinas (78%)
              3. Spinoza (74%)
              4. Ockham (67%)
              5. John Stuart Mill (58%)
              6. Kant (56%)
              7. Jeremy Bentham (54%)
              8. Nel Noddings (50%)
              9. Plato (44%)
              10. Aristotle (42%)
              11. Prescriptivism (39%)
              12. Epicureans (35%)
              13. Jean-Paul Sartre (34%)
              14. Cynics (31%)
              15. Ayn Rand (21%)
              16. Stoics (19%)
              17. David Hume (17%)
              18. Nietzsche (13%)
              19. Thomas Hobbes (2%)

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Buck Birdseed
                It's quite a shoddily-designed test. Too much metaethics (which most philosophers, at least in this selection, only dealt with as a side issue), too few questions about how the mechanics of moral law-making is supposed to function. They do some sort of half-arsed attempts to hide blatant questions about specific philosopher in a general guise (I'm sure that "libery vs. society" question is really "do you agree with the utilitarians or not?"), they should have gone full-steam-ahead and presented longer, more complex models of each stage like they did with the religion test.
                I disagree. I think that metaethics is the way to go. All these philosophers had metaethical views which informed their normative views. If you want to know the similarities re: philosophy (i.e. the way you think about morality, rather than your values), it is a good test.

                Most of the disagreement on this forum occurs because of differences in metaethical views anyway.
                Only feebs vote.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Agathon


                  No - that is very bad.
                  Are you kidding? I've read The Republic from cover to cover and Plato's idea of the ideal society sickens me.
                  "Paul Hanson, you should give Gibraltar back to the Spanish" - Paiktis, dramatically over-estimating my influence in diplomatic circles.

                  Eyewerks - you know you want to visit. No really, you do. Go on, click me.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    1. Jean-Paul Sartre (100%)

                    2. Kant (95%)

                    3. Spinoza (90%)

                    4. Jeremy Bentham (89%)

                    5. John Stuart Mill (82%)

                    Sartre surprised me too (and I also don´t know any of his works), Kant I know a bit, so I´m quite satisfied (because I like his ideas).
                    Blah

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Where are the arguments and proofs?


                      When did proofs become an integral part of philosophy? That's a distinctly Western concept, so I don't see why Eastern philosophy would incorporate it.

                      Confucianism, Daoism and Buddhism all qualify as philosophies in my view. Maybe you disagree, but claiming that they aren't "philosophy" just because they don't follow Western thought patterns doesn't fly.
                      KH FOR OWNER!
                      ASHER FOR CEO!!
                      GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Agathon


                        The founder of utilitarianism and designer of strange prisons. You can look at him if you visit the University of London since his embalmed body is still on display.

                        Here he is.
                        When I was there (University College, London) I heard the story about how his head was used as a rugby ball by one of the other colleges.


                        My #1 was Kant.
                        One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Buck Birdseed

                          You like Plato? You some sort of ****ing fascist or something?
                          Accusations of fascism against Plato are deeply unfair for a few reasons.

                          1) It isn't clear that the Republic is supposed to be a blueprint for a feasible society. The text doesn't unequivocally support this.

                          2) In the later works the Statesman and the Laws, things are toned down quite a bit. The Laws is supposed to be a blueprint for a society.

                          3) Plato had been witness to a massive failure of a democratic state when it was beaten by an authoritarian regime. This had to affect his views.

                          4) Late Platonic legislation depends on the idea that the prospective inhabitants of the state to be constructed share little in the way of norms or customs.
                          Only feebs vote.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            1. Aquinas (100%)
                            Browse Aquinas related books. Click here for info

                            2. St. Augustine (79%)
                            Browse St. Augustine related books. Click here for info

                            3. Aristotle (67%)
                            Browse Aristotle related books. Click here for info

                            4. Spinoza (65%)
                            Browse Spinoza related books. Click here for info

                            5. Ockham (62%)
                            Browse Ockham related books. Click here for info

                            6. Plato (53%)
                            Browse Plato related books. Click here for info

                            7. Jeremy Bentham (52%)
                            Browse Jeremy Bentham related books. Click here for info

                            8. Epicureans (48%)
                            Browse Epicureans related books. Click here for info

                            9. Nietzsche (46%)
                            Browse Nietzsche related books. Click here for info

                            10. John Stuart Mill (44%)
                            Browse John Stuart Mill related books. Click here for info

                            11. Stoics (43%)
                            Browse Stoics related books. Click here for info

                            12. Ayn Rand (40%)
                            Browse Ayn Rand related books. Click here for info

                            13. Nel Noddings (36%)
                            Browse Nel Noddings related books. Click here for info

                            14. Cynics (36%)
                            Browse Cynics related books. Click here for info

                            15. Kant (33%)
                            Browse Kant related books. Click here for info

                            16. Jean-Paul Sartre (32%)
                            Browse Jean-Paul Sartre related books. Click here for info

                            17. David Hume (28%)
                            Browse David Hume related books. Click here for info

                            18. Prescriptivism (28%)
                            Browse Prescriptivism related books. Click here for info

                            19. Thomas Hobbes (12%)
                            Browse Thomas Hobbes related books. Click here for info
                            Jon Miller-
                            I AM.CANADIAN
                            GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
                              Where are the arguments and proofs?


                              When did proofs become an integral part of philosophy? That's a distinctly Western concept, so I don't see why Eastern philosophy would incorporate it.
                              Proofs became an integral part of western philosophy after the publication of Parmenides' poem.

                              Philosophy or Philosophia in Greek is a word coined to describe what these people were doing. The rest of western philosophy is historically and conceptually related to what these people did. Philosophy is a western concept, unless these other people match up in an interesting way with the norms of this tradition, it isn't fair to call them philosophers.
                              Only feebs vote.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Paul Hanson

                                Are you kidding? I've read The Republic from cover to cover and Plato's idea of the ideal society sickens me.
                                Presumably you skipped the bit where Socrates says that the city described in the Republic is "an image laid up in heaven" - a paradigm of justice. Plato was well aware that this wasn't a feasible scheme. That's why he wrote the Statesman and the Laws.
                                Only feebs vote.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X