Military judge panel thingy

[Archaic]

Sheep, the standard is 4 x 12CP subjects. To claim you do 8 x 20CP subjects, which, just with class contact time and not including either transport, or the time to work on assignments and homework, is equal to a 40 hour working week.....just seems rather pathetic when you back down from providing any sort of proof whatsoever.


Look, I'll even provide my academic transcript as available on the web, minus my results. If you're wondering why I've only for 3 units a semester from the 2nd semester onwards, I underloaded on purpose to extend my degree a year, allowing me to take advanced subjects in Japanese that I wouldn't have been able to enroll in otherwise.


LIAM GREGORY POMFRET (4407059)

BS56 BACHELOR OF BUSINESS
Course entry: 08 Feb 2002
Expected course completion: END 2005
Course status: ENROLLED
Major: International Business, Specialisation: Language Specialisation
Attendance mode: I
Attendance type: FT
Total credit points achieved: 84
Home Campus: GP


2002/1
Unit Credit points Unit Status
BSB113 ECONOMICS 12 COMPLETED
BSB119 INTERNATIONAL & ELECTRONIC BUSINESS 12 COMPLETED
BSB126 MARKETING 12 COMPLETED
HHB081 JAPANESE 1 12 COMPLETED

2002/2
Unit Credit points Unit Status
BSB115 MGMT, PEOPLE & ORG 12 COMPLETED
HHB082 JAPANESE 2 12 COMPLETED
IBB202 BUSINESS & THE WORLD ECONOMY 12 COMPLETED

2003/1
Unit Credit points Unit Status
BSB114 GOV, BUS & SOCIETY 12 ENROLLED
HHB083 JAPANESE 3 12 ENROLLED
IBB210 EXPORT MANAGEMENT 12 ENROLLED

2003/2
Unit Credit points Unit Status
BSB122 BUS INFORMATN ANALYSIS & COMMUNICATN 12 ENROLLED
HHB084 JAPANESE 4 12 ENROLLED
IBB211 GLOBALISATION & BUSINESS 12 ENROLLED



Oh yes, and BTW, your "brain tumour" from earlier in the year.....that would've set you back a full semester, at the very least. You either lied about that, or about this, or more than likely, both. Nothing pisses me off more than lying Sheep...

[Whaleboy]

I'm not going to b!tch here, but this panel cannot have ooc conflicts undermining it, and all RP'd conflicts must be recognised as being only RP'd and a bit of fun.

As such, I am not satisfied that in this panel, Archaic and Sheep would be able to get along to the extent required to make this work, and if one is in and one is not, then that would serve to undermine the whole practise. As such, until the two of you can sort out your differences, I regret to say that neither of you will be eligible to stand.

Next election will be in a couple of months after tomorrow, we'll see how things go there.

I hope you both understand and don't take it personally, and understand my position, it is what im sure either of you would do in my position.

[Giovanni Wine]

I don't think it is right to exclude Archaic and Sheep from the poll.

I mean we are going to vote for someone right? if we don't think they will be good judges than we will just not vote them.

I mean, if many people think that Archaic or Sheep is a good judge, excluding him from the poll only because of the other doesn't look fair IMHO.

Saluti

[Whaleboy]

Perhaps, however Sheeps military postings would exclude him at this stage as previously agreed, unless he changes it before tomorrow which is when I shall begin the election. I'll poll Archaic, but I do not want the Sheep/Archaic animosity to disrupt the workings of this organisation.

[Drogue]

elijah: If you want this to be taken seriously, let them stand. This is a democracy, and if you choose who stands, people will disregard it. If you feel it would bring conflict, post that you think people shouldn't vote for them, but it is for all of use to decide, not just you.

[Urban Ranger]

OB (organisational behaviour) theories have it that a moderate degree of conflicts inside a group is fine, because that represents different ideas coming into contact. However, a high degree of conflict, such as what's going on between Archaic and Sheep right now, is destructive to the group.

Therefore, while in theory we should not bar both from standing in the election, we may have no choice unless there is some way we could find to moderate their clashing of heads.

[GeneralTacticus]

Elijah, how are you planning to set the elections up anyway?

[Whaleboy]

Im going to make a poll in a sec, where all who participates in the region can vote. The top 5 will become the judges, and there shall be elections every 2/3 months I'd guess, that would be presumably decided by the first panel of judges.

Considering the advice given, I shall allow Archaic to stand, but not Sheep, not because of anything related to a conflict, but because of the inflated military figures, that as I initially said, is a preventative for people to join. This panel is designed to help people give realistic military figures, I would hypothesise that inflated figures are because one does not know fully how the military impacts on the economy, and how much military one nation can have, so people try to make reasonable figures, not overstate their figures out of any malicious intent. As such, this panel will help to rectify that situation, by keeping that most important aspect of a nation with regards to foreign policy, within the bounds of realism, and to a level which the Int. community can recognise and interface with, related to ones nation of course.

It is not like the court, and will not become a conduit by which individual member nations can conduct elements of their own foreign policy. Hopefully, judges can keep this separate, but certainly other judges will be able to keep an eye on other judges making sure they do not abuse this position of power and this panel for their own ends. As such I can reassure people, specifically Sheep, that this will be a neutral unbiased organisation.

Poll coming up soon...

[GeneralTacticus]

How many candidates are there going to be? Last I checked, there were only four suggested...