The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How do you feel about starting a new Warlords Team DG?
Come and see me at WePlayCiv
Worship the Comic here! Term IV DFM for Trade, Term V CP & Term VI DM, Term VII SMC of Apolytonia - SPDGI, Minister of the Interior of the PTW InterSite Demo Game
... furthermore (some of my best thoughts come after I hit the post button)...
I agree with those who lament the lack of activity in older games (although I don't agree on the cause) and I see the point of view of the administration regarding the resources dedicated to each new game taking time and attention which are not infiite.
The simple question is... why a new forum for each game? Put all the Civ4 MP DGs in the same forum. Each team get's it's own sub forum. If a new team meets a certain requirement for interest and particpation give them their own team forum, but leave all the games in the same main forum. This would benefit the older games with continued exposure while giving newer games a chance to start without objection.
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
American Thanksgiving is a down night. Only one game.
Proof that in the US market, hockey will never ever compete with football.
I like nye's idea about a single forum for such games. The pitboss-based team game idea I had would fit nicely in such a forum.
And btw, I voted earlier, and in favour. It is also clear that the folks who were 'demanding' such a forum have decided not to participate in the democratic process of polling; as Locutus points out, they could have easily swept this poll.
Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war .... aw, forget that nonsense. Beer, please.
there are several Yes options, yet only 1 NO option.
Additionally the NO is a moot point now because the game has been created and moved to another forum, so not starting a game on the basis that it would hurt another is foolishness.
The psychometric properties of this poll are ridiculous, the poll is biased towards the no option.
$0.02
First Master, Banan-Abbot of the Nana-stary, and Arch-Nan of the Order of the Sacred Banana.
Marathon, the reason my friends and I have been playing the same hotseat game since 2006...
Originally posted by Beta
I like nye's idea about a single forum for such games. The pitboss-based team game idea I had would fit nicely in such a forum.
//agreed//
*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- Beta
I have to say that some of the arguments against don't sit well with me. I can see the point of not wanting to stifle existing projects on the site, but I
can't agree with the solution.
I was considering crossposting from the other thread, but I think I'll just this from NYE's post. That pretty much sums up my position.
Originally posted by Metaliturtle
This poll is invalid
there are several Yes options, yet only 1 NO option.
The psychometric properties of this poll are ridiculous, the poll is biased towards the no option.
I am not a psychometrician so I wouldn't know; I was simply assuming that the Yes options would get rolled together, as a general expression of interest.
And I agree, I think the poll is moot now, not because the game got set up elsewhere, nor because the matter is not important to the community (it is), but more because it is clear that many of the folks who are interested are clearly not expressing it here.
Okay, guys. We've discussed the matter internally, taking into account all the arguments pro and con that have been raised in this thread and the other one and have decided that we *will* most definitely support a Warlords DG at this time.
Of course, with a game already set up on CGN you guys will have to figure out for yourselves if you still want to set up the exact same format that's running there here as well or if you want to go for something different, but that's your decision to make and we'll support whatever you guys want. Discuss it and once a decision has been reached let me know so I can create the necessary forums and civgroups and everything.
*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- Beta
First Master, Banan-Abbot of the Nana-stary, and Arch-Nan of the Order of the Sacred Banana.
Marathon, the reason my friends and I have been playing the same hotseat game since 2006...
Comment