A further use for Armies

[Theseus]

Emperor, and be advised that this game was played to test some thoughts on warfighting, so the number of GLs is a little out of the ordinary.

Army
Heroic Epic
Army
Sun Tzu
Army
Sistine
Leonardo's
Bach
Smith
Army
Military Academy

So, 11 so far (and I captured the Colossus and the Pyramids )

BTW, I noticed your tip about buying workers. I used to do the same, check every turn, but I would keep the workers working. Now that I'm a *little* more focused on reputation, I like your idea.

[Arrian]

That's a lot of leaders. Well done.

With regard to the workers, it's not so much reputation, because rep doesn't matter to me on my continent. I intend to kill them all anyway.

It's all about not wanting to be attacked before my strikeforce is ready. In the case of my new China game, I actually did get attacked - by Russia - while building chariots. How annoying. Luckily, they sent a total of 3 warriors and 2 spearmen my way. They also got the Japanese and Germans to declare on me, but I never saw 1 German unit (I graciously made peace later for their map and gold), and I've crushed Japan.

No luck w/leaders thus far, but since most of the AI's have 4-6 cities, and I have 11, coming up on 12, I should be all set. Germany and England are horribly weak, having fought each other to a standstill earlier in the game. France is small but solid, but between Russia and me. Once Russia dies, I will wheel on France. Then Germany. Then England. Then finish Japan. India will be last.

I have to take a good look at the map and really think about iron denial. Russia will lose theirs this turn (next to Moscow). France has one, right on the edge of their borders. That will be easy to cut. I haven't paid attention to the English and Germans, though. That's important. I just beat Construction out of the AI, so Pikemen aren't that far off (must kill Germany soon, must kill the scientific civ soon... arg! So much to do, so little time).

-Arrian

[Lord Merciless]

How big are your maps?

[Theseus]

Me?

The game I'm describing is el mencey's 100X100 Earth map, with 6 AI civ opponents.

[Arrian]

Standard for me. I asked for a Standard/Continents, but got a mega-continent with a total of 7 civs on it. Somewhere out there is a very lonely civ, quietly building.

I wonder... can I win via domination in the middle ages? I've never done that before.

-Arrian

[Lord Merciless]

I'm currently playing Rome on a huge continental map. I have eliminated three AI Civs so far. The main continent has 8 civs and these guys are outresearching me. I want to attack, but all AI civs seem to live in real harmony with each other. Any suggestion on how to get them to fight each other?

[Theseus]

LM, would you mind starting a new thread with that post?

I think there are a LOT of people, both builders and warmongers, who would like to explore that question. Come up with a good title... we might even get Vel and Aeson into the discussion.

[Moonsinger]

Re: A further use for Armies

Theseus: Have you tried this on patch 1.29f? The AI used to fear the army, but not any more. Nowadays, I notice that they are more willing to attack my army. A lot of them die in trying, but in the end they manage to destroy my army.

[Theseus]

Yep, this is all on 1.29f.

I've made the same observation, though, and handle my babies a little more carefully.

For instance, in this example, when the first Army was still just 2 Swordsmen, I didn't put it at risk until I could position it on a mountain.

I didn't create the Army Waystations, on open ground, until I had added a Musketman to each, bringing them all up to 14 HP. Even then, I had an elite Swordsman stacked with each as insurance. The AIs wouldn't touch them, even with vet Cavs.

[Arrian]

That's a good change I didn't know about. I haven't used armies much since 1.29 came out, so I didn't notice it. Good. I target AI armies immediately. Of course, I understand how to use bombardment to make the task easier, but that's another story...

-Arrian

[Zanthis]

Whats the advantage of a mixed army vs a homogeneous army? Wouldn't 3 musketmen provide better defence than 1 musketman and 2 swordsmen?

[Theseus]

Well, for defensive purposes, yes, clearly a 3X Musketmen Army would be better.

I end up with these mixed unit Armies for a couple of reasons, however.

* I almost always try to generate a GL early in the Swordsmen era (unless I've gotten very lucky with an Archer), which will be used to create the first Army. The Swordsman* who does this can't be upgraded, and can;t generate another GL, so he goes in the Army. That Army then goes out and wins one battle, so I can build the HE. The next Swordsman* also goes into the first Army, which is now insanely strong for the time being. As more Swordsman generate GLs, I keep creating 2X Sword Armies. In the game described above, I went through this 3 times.

* By the time one reaches the era of 4-attack units, the 2x Sword Armies are looking a little weak, even with 10 hps. I generally add a vet Musketman at this point... now I've got a 14 hp Army, but it's better than that.

On offense, the order of attack is elite Sword - elite Sword - vet Musket... that's still pretty good against any defender except Muskets and above.

On defense, the Musket always goes first... even from multiple attackers in the same turn. This is the part I really like! So let's say it gets attacked by a Knight, and loses 3 hps, but then defeats the Knight. Then another Knight hits... the Musket defends again with 1/3 of all available hps, so in the case probably 4 hps. And on and on. Also, note that each defending unit, except the last, gets the use of ALL its hps, rather than dying on the use of its last.

* Later, I will typically add an Infantry to this kind of mixed unit Army, which will again get the benefit of all the underlying hps.

I have these Armies in almost every game (well, not AU 102 ). My guess is that after PTW comes out, I'll just have 1 per game, due to the upgradeability of Swordsmen.

Or maybe not; they're incredibly useful. Imagine one with Immortals instead...

[Foolishman]

Hm, I have a question, couldn't you use your armies as more a buffer for your attacking troops. Example, then enemy swordsman come and challange your main force, send your army in and attack the swordsman, eliminating them, and always have the army in front of the main force to attract all the fire. Though I have only used armies a few times, this proved well on regent, the only problem was that the AI might try to just go for the attack force because they go for weak targets, but in theory, the army could be a great buffer and a "softening" unit for your main attack, or that is at leats my thought... For what it is worth

[Panag]

hi ,

they should give the option to unload an army , ...

have a nice day

[Gen.Dragolen]

Foolishman,

I know of one trick that helps: fortify the army on a hill or mountain (strongpoint) where the enemy troops can still pass. Leave the rest of your forces just far enough back that the AI can't attack and the army should take a passing shot, like as if it was in a fortress.

I could be wrong, but I've seen it happen a few times already, and not just with armies.


D.