Need information for making a mod...

[Dimorier Maximus]

I am making a mod, and I want to know:

1) What civilization do you usually play as AND WHY?
2) What difficulty level do you play AND win on?
3) What civilizations do you consider as weak AND WHY?

(Please answer these questions coherently and give full explanations as to why. I posted this in the strategy forum because I think you people will have better insights as to tricks and loopholes and the like. Thanks in advance.)

When you vote, vote for the civilization you use most often. In my mod, I am going to attempt to keep the civs unique, yet try to add some balance so that you may be tempted to try civilizations that you consider weak at the moment.

[FrustratedPoet]

1) Egypt - fast workers and cheap temple! Also, their relatively poor UU can work to your disadvantage since you can save up using it for when you really want to have your GA. I play China a lot too .... any industrious Civ really, but Egypt are my favourites.

2) Regent. I just moved up to Monarch, but have only played one game.

3) Babylon are the weakest IMHO. They are always so small and culture-focused that I simply roll over them whenever I want to. England are very weak also, and to a lesser degree Russia and India. The non-militaristic and non-industrious Civs are the easiest to fight against.

[Harovan]

This should be a multichoice poll.

1) I don't play any civ "usually". I play them almost all. Which one I prefer in a given game, depends on map size, shape of the land, world age and on the goal I want to achieve. 2 civs I did not play so far, and probably never will: Aztecs (too early GA) and English (traits and UU suck). Abstain. No vote from me.

2) Flipping between Monarch and Emperor. I won at Deity, but don't consider these games fun. I'm neither a masochist nor a genius.

3) The English are probably the weakest. If talking about AI civs, all expansionist civs except the Iroquois are usually weak, because the AI doesn't handle this trait well.

[Sean]

Germans. Reason, Panzers.

[DeepO]

I concur with Sir Ralph, this should have been a multichoice poll. But to give some input, I voted the

1. Persians, because industrious / scientific is about as powerful as ind / rel, and their UU is unbeatable, Immortals rock! (If you have iron, that is. It wouldn't be the first time you're stuck with a horse-rush because you have plenty of horses, but no iron). Egypt is a close second. And every industrial civ is good, IMHO.

2. Emperor. But after the MT MV is finished, I'll start with deity and keep the Emperor level for scenarios only.

3. weakest AI civ? It depends... but the English are no good most of the time. Babylon is normally also weak, but if they are in a good position, they can become powerful as culturally inferior civs lose their cities to them.

DeepO

[Dimorier Maximus]

Thanks for the input guys. Sorry I didn't make it a multichoice poll, but the input is more what I was looking for anyways.

So far, England needs some serious help to be enticing, and the Babylonians are supposedly weak as well. Personally, I find Babylon a good rush civilization, though since the original Civilization, the AI has never done well with them. I think they are actually a pretty decent civ for a human to control though.

Thanks again, and keep up the discussion on weakness. Not just per civ, but per attribute or per UU such as expansionist or the Man-O-War.

[Dimorier Maximus]

I almost missed the Aztecs. I agree that they are a rather weak civilization. What if I made the Jaguar Warrior replace the swordsman as a 3.2.2? Would that help, Sir Ralph?

[Velociryx]

D'oh! Did somebody say my Aztecs were weak?

-=Vel=-

[Dimorier Maximus]

Originally posted by Velociryx
D'oh! Did somebody say my Aztecs were weak?

-=Vel=-

Are you really good with the Aztecs or something? If so, please tell me and I won't change them. I can see some nice bonuses...like you nearly get the expansionist bonus with those Jag Warriors...though huts aren't as good and you don't get a free one to start with.

[Catt]

1. I'm playing random about every game. My long-time sentimental favorites are Egypt and Japan, China trying to break in and make it a threesome. Egypt: industrious, religious, great UU for timing GA (bad UU for actually using ). Japan: religious, militaristic, great UU. China: industrious, militaristic, great UU.

2.

Originally posted by Sir Ralph
2) Flipping between Monarch and Emperor. I won at Deity, but don't consider these games fun. I'm neither a masochist nor a genius.

Exactly what Sir Ralph said. I have more fun at Emperor and Monarch.

3. If weak when played by the human, then I find England to be a challenge (maybe 1.29f's tweaks to commercial can help a bit?). I also find any expansionist civ more challenging if the random map / random barbarian generator doesn't cooperate. If weak when played by the AI, then I find the Zulu seem to always implode by the early industrial age - sometimes the Aztecs do as well. Often Germany's aggressiveness results in his elimination prior to panzers.

(Aztecs played by a human can be a very, very strong civ).

Catt

[Velociryx]

As the Aztec, if you start even reasonably close to two other civs (which happens the vast majority of the time on everything but 'pelago maps), you're set for the rest of the game.

Sir Ralph is right...the early GA sucks wind, and on the surface of it, a two-move warrior might not seem like much, but mobility trumps raw firepower every time in Civ3 (and more often than not, in real life). What is it about Panzers or MA that make them so awesome? Their firepower is impressive, but it's their movement that make them so awesome (same with Cavalry and the Chinese Rider...the thing that MAKES them powerful is their flexibility...and that, in large part in Civ3, is expressed in terms of movement points.

So....with the Aztec, you get:
* Benefits of being a Religious Civ (one of the strongest, and arguably THE strongest Civ Trait in the game)

* More Great Leaders than the norm (Militaristic)

* The crucial benefits of the Expansionist trait (popping goody huts faster than the bulk of your rivals, and even if they're barbs, you're militaristic! Those barbs = all but guaranteed promotions for your forces!)

* The crucial benefits of the Industrious trait (lots of early warfare = tons of slaves captured in the ancient age, when they're most important....and so what if they're only half speed workers? If you have sixty of them, you'll terraform like lightning!)

And best of all....you have a fast, slow-mover! What I mean by that is....you've got your Jags....a spiffy two-move unit that *upgrades* to the powerhouse slow-poke of the ancient age, the Swordsman. How cool is it to spirit your swordsmen to the battle with the speed of horsemen by not upgrading them till they get to the front? Yowza that's power!

-=Vel=-

[Dimorier Maximus]

Here is what I am thinking so far:

1) Greatly improve the Man-O-War stats. (make ironclads come later in tech tree as well)
2) Babs are fine as they are?
3) Possibly change the Jaguar Warrior to replace the swordsman with the stats: 3.2.2
4) Give swordsmen, Jaguar Warriors, Legionaries, and Immortals the marine ability.
3) Pikemen: 2.3.1
4) Musketmen: 3.4.1 (marine ability)
5) Musketeer: 5.4.1 (upgrades to Infantry)
6) Panzer: 18.8.3
7) swordsmen, Legionaries upgrade to Musketmen
8) Immortals upgrade to Riflemen
9) Jaguar Warriors upgrade to Mech Inf (very expensive upgrade of course )
10) Paratrooper: 10.12.1
11) Marine: 12.10.1
12) Cossack: 7.4.3
13) F-15: 10.6 | 4.7.2

Any suggestions for the Man-O-War stats?
I'm thinking: 4.3.4 | 3.1.2
And make the Ironclad come with Industrial tech.

[Dimorier Maximus]

Vel,

You've made a good case for the Aztecs. Whether or not I change their UU to replace the swordsman largely rests on you. Do you think you would like to try it that way? If not, the Aztecs stay as they are. I just don't particularly like the way they are set up as a civ, but I realize that different people adopt different strategies. Also, it would be good not to have swordsmen replacement overkill.

[alexman]

A two-move swordsman?

If you asked me what is the best UU in the game, I would offer the 3-1-2 Mounted Warrior. Can you imagine what a Mounted Warrior with extra defense would do to balance?

[Velociryx]

I would *really* hate to be the guy who got squeezed between the Aztec and Iroquois on this map!

-=Vel=-