Nethog's Civ3 PTW Tech Tree & Unit Summary

[Nethog]

PF, glad to hear no comments from you about "clipping margins"

As for the tech calculator, I agree, its better just to use the base values as a guide for trading and research path planning.

[planetfall]

Originally posted by Nethog
See http://forums.civfanatics.com/showt...&threadid=29485 for more details on how to calculate actual tech cost.

Above link breaks when clicked on, actual URL is
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=29485

http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=29485

== PF

[l.galant]

Thank you very much Nethog for your great job.
You really achieve a "Great Wonder of the World" for civ's players.

Little bug report: On your PTW Unit Summary, you wrote "Samarai" instead of "Samurai".

[Nethog]

Thanks for the compliments l.galant. I fixed the typo in my working copy of the units summary, I won't upload a new version to my website until I make other revisions, or 1 month or so passes. Thanks for finding the typo.

[Panag]

Originally posted by planetfall


The game documenters must be the same ignorant people who brought us:

• AEGIS ships that don't defend vs bombers
  
• irrelevant navies
  
• minuscule air forces
  

And who says there is no call for a Civ4?

Have a great weekend.

== PF

hi ,

lets hope they add the option "double defense against airunits" in the next patch , .......

we should also have the option to let several units move at ones to a certain point true the use of a couple clicks with the mouse , like in C&C , ......

have a nice day

[War4ever]

as the others have said, well done, things like this make it easier for everyone