No Incas?!

[KaiserIsak]

I just saw a mistake in my spelling from last post. It should be:
99% of the world claims that it is democratic (it probably does not change anything for you, but thats what it was supposed to be)


It does not matter what they call it.
Nowbody i know support the soviet union, or any other socialistic nation that have ever excisted. But i do know many that supports marx theories. And he did not told stalin to kill of his population, did he? He actually said that democracy was about the most important thing. Its not his (OR HIS THEORY) fault that his name have been used to slaughter populations.
How can you say that a country who used about 90% of its money on the military was a peoples nation? Because that is what a socialistic nation is suppsed to be.
I dont say that socialism works, i say that as long as no countries is doing what "socialism tells them to do", i will not call them socialistis nations. And that include democracy. No country in the world deserve to be called socialistic, it may never be anyone either, but there have not been yet.

I think all the former and current "socialistic" nations are screwed, but i look upon the world, read my history, and i find that the world have always, and still is screwed. You have to be blind to not see that the world and its system is killing itself. Now.
Socialism may not be the solution, but capitalism is the sure death.

[bigvic]

wow. socialism talk.

well, incas were definately commies, before commies were commies, so to speak...


anyway, kind of dissapointed w/ choices, or lack thereof, in govs in civ III.

So, any news? Incas, in or out?

[Imp. Montezuma]

Originally posted by KaiserIsak
I just saw a mistake in my spelling from last post. It should be:
99% of the world claims that it is democratic (it probably does not change anything for you, but thats what it was supposed to be)
...scip...

Socialism may not be the solution, but capitalism is the sure death.

Well, Kaiser, so

No country in the world deserve to be called socialistic
No country in the world deserve to be called monarch
No country in the world deserve to be called peoples
No country in the world deserve to be called democratic
No country in the world deserve to be called co-operative
No country in the world deserve to be called federative
No country in the world deserve to be called unitarian
No country in the world deserve to be called centralised
No country in the world deserve to be called communal
No country in the world deserve to be called western
No country in the world deserve to be called eastern
No country in the world deserve to be called northern
No country in the world deserve to be called southern
No country in the world deserve to be called polar

Definetely None and Nothing haven't names
Nothing sense

Nothing...
...

In beginning was Word...

All of rest ended with Word...

The End. Period.

[kring]

There is still no word about Incas/Incans being in or out.

[dunk]

Originally posted by bigvic
Anyway, if the game supports up to 31 civs, why only 8 anyway? Why not 15? Oh yeah, 7 more in PTW II, coming to a store near you next year for just 30$. Ah, capitalism....

My hope is the PTW editor will allow adding of civs. That leaves 7 civs that we can make ourselves.

[KaiserIsak]

Some countries call themselves democratic (like north korea), but they are not. I think we can all agree on that.
Some countries call themselves democratic, and they are at least more democratic (like norway). They may be called democratic. We probably can agree on that too.
Some countries call themselves socialistic (like cambodia) and slaughter their population, something that have nothing to do with socialism. If you know your theory, then you will agree.
By the defination of socialism, and the way socialists are lokking upon the defination, there have been NO socialistic nations.
Marx, or even Lenin NEVER told anyone to slaughter their populations or install despotic governements. They told them excacly the opposite. The countries still called it socialism, even if they did the opposite of what they were supposed to do. they could have called it anything, but they took a name that sounded good. And at the same time they made that names reputation terrible. While does who really wanted to do some socialism were accused for supporting the murders.
Its not a natural law that socialsm and killing is two thing of the same case. Its simply someone who have made killing in the name of the peoples.
Socialism is not what they had in eastu europe. Its something we still have not seen, and may never see.