New Civs Update from IGN

[SpencerH]

It doesnt mean they'll make it to the xp, but it does mean they're on the table for discussion. If not here, then elsewhere.

[Stuie]

Originally posted by jimmytrick
Hmm..someone tell me if this image displays..

This one's even better, as the dino is in the unit box:

[SpencerH]

New tech - eugenics

unit- tyranosaur

[kring]

In one of the numerous E3 interviews, mention was made of a "possible" dinosaur scenario.

I have to leave for now or I would track it down.

[civman2000]

where is that from ????

[SpencerH]

you mean the movie?

[notyoueither]

I don't think Mark said 'don't discuss dinos'.

I think he said this is not the place for any trolling....

[MarkG]

Originally posted by notyoueither
I don't think Mark said 'don't discuss dinos'.

I think he said this is not the place for any trolling....

i said what he said i said

[SpencerH]

But if he said what you said he said, then he said it, or....

To hell with mongols, I want to attack other players cities with hordes of nuclear tyranosaurs!

[jsw363]

On the Gaul/ Celt question. I believe that Julius Caesar said it best.
"Gallia est omnis divisa in partes tres, quarum unam incolunt Belgae, aliam Aquitani, tertiam qui ipsorum lingua Celtae, nostra Galli appellantur."

"All Gaul is divided into three parts, one of which the Belgae inhabit, the Aquitani another, those who in their own language are called Celts, in our Gauls, the third."

I would think that it's probably more appropriate to call these peoples Celts, since that is what they call themselves in Celtic (or Gaelic.) But then again they do use the anglicized name Japan instead of Nippon, so who knows how it will end up...

[JtheJackal]

Korea in?

Well not that im spiting everyone who says they aren't, the supposed Korean UU was seen in the video along with other unique units. Makes you think.

[SeferKoheleth]

Originally posted by Eli


Ok then... Firaxis should reduce their estimated profits by 40$.

My take is that Firaxis caved into European and Arab Jew-hating. There's really no excuse to exclude the Hebrews and include the Gauls (hello, more worthless French??).

Let's face it.... we may have designed the moral and religious customs of 3 billion people, played an unreplaceable role in the development of Middle Age commerce, and contribited immensely to the development of science and technology.... but we're not well-liked.

I'm not buying the expansion now either.

[SeferKoheleth]

On the other hand, I'm very glad to see the inclusion of BOTH the Ottomans and Arabs. For those who think they're the same... read your history!!!

The Ottomans were NOT Arabs-- they were Turks, and they dominated the Middle East for centuries, as the Arabs did. They are both quite worthwhile for inclusion.

The list should have been

Arabs
Ottomans
Hebrews
Incas
Mongols
Vikings
Ethiopians
Spanish

[Panag]

Originally posted by SeferKoheleth
On the other hand, I'm very glad to see the inclusion of BOTH the Ottomans and Arabs. For those who think they're the same... read your history!!!

The Ottomans were NOT Arabs-- they were Turks, and they dominated the Middle East for centuries, as the Arabs did. They are both quite worthwhile for inclusion.

The list should have been

Arabs
Ottomans
Hebrews
Incas
Mongols
Vikings
Ethiopians
Spanish

hi ,

maybe with a full editor we , as the player's shall be able to change that , ....

have a nice day