New Noobs Tracking Thread 1

[1889]

and this too.

This is a pain. I hope we can expedite the vote and get this down to one. I abstain, they're all fine for me.

[kermit_the_frog]

Game sendt Vovan --------- Turn:1 Year: 4000 BC

Game 1 looks OK

[vovan]

Saves on to Burly.

Game1 = sux
Game2 = awesome
Game3 = good

[burly]

Before I play, I'll put in my 2 cents.

Game 1 = terrible
Game 2 = okay
Game 3 = Awsome

Let's play 1 more round, just to see what we can get at with our second settler.

[burly]

3950 BC sent to Gamecube64 (x3)

[Gamecube64]

ok

[Gamecube64]

terrific

[Gamecube64]

bad

[burly]

Kermit,
Looks like game 2 is the consensus, except that you didn't mention it. Is it okay for you?

[kermit_the_frog]

game 2 sucks, i have no speacial resourses and only mountains and a couple grasslands

[burly]

Okay everybody. Let's try this. Don't rank the games by better, best, worst. Rank them like this:

Bad = 0
Okay = 1
Good = 2
'Best Start Ever" = 4

Be sure to rank all three games. We'll see how they stack up. If the one with the highest score turns out to be a terrible start for one person, we should consider trying again. We could change the settings to temperate and 5 billion years, to remove some of the mountains and jungle/marsh.

My rankings are

Game1: 0 points
Game2: 1 point
Game3: 2 points

[1889]

Ground Hog Day

Game 1: 1
Game 2: 1
Game 3: 1

I'm sick of playing 4000BC. I'm sick of waiting for the magic start that will win the game for you. Perhaps a random map is not the answer. If you restart, leave me out.

[Gamecube64]

Game 1 - 1
Game 2 - 2
Game 3 - 0

[burly]

1889
I'm not trying to create a "magic start" that will win the game for me. Considering that this game will take over a year to complete if we play all the way through, I would think that nobody wants a bad start. PBEM games take patience. I don't intend on restarting at the moment. It's just a last resort. But don't worry. If we restart. We will leave you out.

[vovan]

Game 1 - 1
Game 2 - 4
Game 3 - 2