Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Civs included. Just the facts madam.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Thank you SilverDragon

    So, so far we know that:

    GREEKS ARE IN
    AMERICANS ARE IN
    GERMANS ARE IN
    CHINESE ARE IN
    ROMANS ARE IN
    FRENCH ARE IN
    RUSSIANS ARE IN
    ZULUS ARE IN
    ENGLISH ARE IN
    AZTECS ARE IN
    EGYPTIANS ARE IN
    INDIANS ARE IN

    12 confirmed - 4 to go. (16 civs will be included in CIV 3)

    JAPANESE (open for debate plz see the samurai(?) unit at http://viewer.fgnonline.com/fgn_medi...ws%2Funits.jpg

    INDIAN TRIBE IS IN(possibly Iroquois or maybe Sioux - see the thread for hints)

    MONGOLS (open for debate, see leader in civ iii page of Apolyton)



    [This message has been edited by paiktis22 (edited May 14, 2001).]

    Comment


    • #32
      quote:

      Originally posted by SilverDragon on 05-14-2001 07:27 PM
      Egypt is in, and so is India. There are seven screenshots of leaders in Computer Gaming World:

      Mao Tse Tung
      An Egyptian pharoah
      Abraham Lincoln
      Caesar
      Mahatma Ghandi
      Joan of Arc
      Elizabeth I


      RRR its Mao Zedong why wont they change that!! pinyin!!! not wades!!

      I think they have pretty much the same as in civ2, at least that what it looks like so far.

      And about the Iroquois, the Iroqouis at its hight had only about 1 million people making it smaller than the Incas, Aztecs, Mayans or Sioux it had no identifiably unique units, its only unique features are it had a very advanced govternment and it was the first strong alliance between several tribes. So because of that I dont think it would be a good candidate for a Pre-made Civ.

      Comment


      • #33
        quote:

        Originally posted by ancient on 05-14-2001 08:04 PM
        And about the Iroquois, the Iroqouis at its hight had only about 1 million people making it smaller than the Incas, Aztecs, Mayans or Sioux it had no identifiably unique units, its only unique features are it had a very advanced govternment and it was the first strong alliance between several tribes. So because of that I dont think it would be a good candidate for a Pre-made Civ.


        This is true, but the Iriquois were also the CIvilization closest to the Americans in power in Northern America... the Iriquois nation was the most organized and probably the largest united and coherent native american nation.

        ------------------
        "Third option, third option!"
        Let's have civ bonuses that YOU control!
        Lime roots and treachery!
        "Eventually you're left with a bunch of unmemorable posters like Cyclotron, pretending that they actually know anything about who they're debating pointless crap with." - Drake Tungsten

        Comment


        • #34
          So do all these leader faces mean that we're losing the ability of the civs to be governed by people of either sex?

          Comment


          • #35
            Mark my words.... I bet that all the classic CivI civs will be in.
            *grumbles about work*

            Comment


            • #36
              Yeah the twelve civs so far were all in CIV1. So I bet The Mongols and the Babylonians are in too. Plus the one native american tribe... only one to guess about
              [This message has been edited by Maxxes (edited May 14, 2001).]

              Comment


              • #37
                I'll put my money on the Babylonians being in. Surely just one civ from the birthplace of civilisation would be an injustice to the history of civilisation!!

                Comment


                • #38
                  Check out the bluish samurai-looking unit in THIS SCREENSHOT. Can we conclude that the Japanese are in?
                  [This message has been edited by Ralf (edited May 14, 2001).]

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    quote:

                    Originally posted by JamesJKirk on 05-14-2001 09:35 PM
                    So do all these leader faces mean that we're losing the ability of the civs to be governed by people of either sex?


                    They did the same with SMAC: you can customize leader name, gender etc. but you end with the same face. How silly! I chosed a female University Leader (Madame Curie, BTW) to give women their merits, but I get the same mad scientist with green/red glasses

                    ------------------
                    Admiral Naismith AKA mcostant
                    "We are reducing all the complexity of billions of people over 6000 years into a Civ box. Let me say: That's not only a PkZip effort....it's a real 'picture to Jpeg heavy loss in translation' kind of thing."
                    - Admiral Naismith

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Personally if the Celts don't get in I think it is a crime, considering we go back further than the Romans. I would like to see us Welsh get in but sadly I think they've already got enough programming to do.

                      I'm sure the: Celts and Spanish will get in

                      and i'm pretty sure that is a picture of a Mongol (Genghis Kahn perhaps)

                      Some official words would be nice

                      [This message has been edited by Lenius (edited May 15, 2001).]
                      [This message has been edited by Lenius (edited May 15, 2001).]

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        The Mongols are in... check the Genghis Khan screenshot at GameSpot.
                        Wiio's First Law: Communication usually fails, except by accident.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          I was 100% sure I needed some input though.
                          So, I agree with you guys it is the Mongol leader.

                          So, so far we know that:

                          GREEKS ARE IN
                          AMERICANS ARE IN
                          GERMANS ARE IN
                          CHINESE ARE IN
                          ROMANS ARE IN
                          FRENCH ARE IN
                          RUSSIANS ARE IN
                          ZULUS ARE IN
                          ENGLISH ARE IN
                          AZTECS ARE IN
                          EGYPTIANS ARE IN
                          INDIANS ARE IN
                          MONGOLS ARE IN
                          INDIAN TRIBE IS IN(possibly Iroquois or maybe Sioux - see the thread for hints)

                          14 confirmed - 2 to go. (16 civs will be included in CIV 3)


                          JAPANESE (open for debate plz see the samurai(?) unit at http://viewer.fgnonline.com/fgn_media.jsp?media=http%3A%2F%2Fwww .fgnonline.com%2Fmedia%2Fpc%2Fnews%2Funits.jpg

                          --------------------------
                          VIKINGS (?) (see the boat at the abovementioned ULR. Ralf is pretty sure it's a long boat. After seeing it, I think it could be a trireme as well)



                          [This message has been edited by paiktis22 (edited May 15, 2001).]

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            dp
                            [This message has been edited by paiktis22 (edited May 15, 2001).]

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              quote:

                              Originally posted by paiktis22 on 05-15-2001 04:27 PM
                              VIKINGS (?) (see the boat at the abovementioned ULR. Ralf is pretty sure it's a long boat. After seeing it, I think it could be a trireme as well)



                              Giving it a quick look, it reminds me strongly of an Viking longboat, but I cannot say that I am 100% in any way. It doesnt have any war-shields on the sides, neither the classic red-white sails. Also the prow & stern should perhaps be more sky-protruded. Ah well, we just have to wait and see...

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                [quote]Originally posted by paiktis22 on 05-15-2001 04:36 PM
                                A lot of people have said that all classic CIV I civs are in. I see this too and I agree to the proposition that this means that the Babylonians are in.
                                We still need hard evidence to include them in though.

                                Lenious, as things turn out I am very sceptical about the Celts and the Spanish. But still we have to find evidence (if there is any yet) to discover about the 2 remaining civs. I have no hard evidence for this but I'd bet my last drachma (much more subtler pronounced actually: thrahmee - th as in then) Babylonians are in.

                                We also need to find out which exactly the Indian tribe is.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X