quote:![]() Originally posted by MarkG on 05-16-2001 08:46 AM
Originally posted by Roman on 05-16-2001 08:35 AM some people even noticed a preformance decrease on the site because of it ![]() |

quote:![]() Originally posted by MarkG on 05-16-2001 08:46 AM
Originally posted by Roman on 05-16-2001 08:35 AM some people even noticed a preformance decrease on the site because of it ![]() |
quote:![]() Originally posted by Roman on 05-16-2001 08:45 AM What if the Firaxis quote is refering to the no. of selectable civs rather than the no. of civs per game. ![]() |
quote:![]() Originally posted by Kull on 05-16-2001 10:44 AM I suspect that Firaxis DID intend to stick with the "standard 8", and has been influenced by the vociferous objection to that limit. Whether it can be changed at this stage of development is an open question, but it sounds like they're taking another look. ![]() |
quote:![]() Originally posted by Kull on 05-16-2001 10:44 AM I think it's pretty clear what Mike is referring to: 1) Firaxis HAS announced that there will be 16 selectable civs. 2) Firaxis has NOT said how many can appear simultaneously in one game. ![]() |
quote:![]() Frankly I'm surprised that such a fundamental issue is still open to adjustment at this late date. I suspect that Firaxis DID intend to stick with the "standard 8", and has been influenced by the vociferous objection to that limit. Whether it can be changed at this stage of development is an open question, but it sounds like they're taking another look. ![]() |
quote:![]() Originally posted by Father Beast on 05-16-2001 02:58 PM I must say, we must really be civ3 news junkies, if the announcement of what amounts to "no comment" makes a piece of news we all jump on. ![]() |
quote:![]() Originally posted by MarkG on 05-16-2001 04:14 PM [QUOTE]Originally posted by Father Beast on 05-16-2001 02:58 PM if only you stopped to notice that up until now everybody assumed that 8 civs were done and final and now that is totally changed.... if only.... ![]() ![]() |
Comment