Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is there any reason a civ couldn't have more than one UU?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Maybe instead of balancing the other civs, you could remove a trait or starting techs from the civs with additional units, and not allow the new units to give a golden age either.

    Comment


    • #17
      In my opinion, you can give many UUs to each civ, probably make all units unique... But that would be a hard task... (Under this suggestion, all units in each civ would be name differently and have different stats, but, possibly, the same image. For example, US stealth fighter would be F-117, stealth bomber - B-2, bomber - B-29, modern armour - M-1 Abrams, Tank - Sherman, etc. While Russia would have MiGs, T-29 tanks, and their infantry would be cheaper and weaker and called "conscripts". Britain would have Spitfires, Tornadoes, Scorpion tanks, France would have Mirage fighters, etc. Of course many other civs, which were not so powerful at a time, could use other countries technology (for example, XX age jet Indian air force would be made of Mirage fighters, just like French, as it is in reality) or mixed technology (for example, Spanish used German military tech before WW2 and US tech later; Germany in late XX age used it's own tanks but US planes). All civilizations at start would have only axemen :-) .However, such mod would be very interesting but hard to create, since certain civs (like USA) would have no representations in certain ages. Anyway, here I tried to list representations of civs in different times (sometimes they aren't very real actually, but it is the only way we can make it)...
      Bysantine Empire - Ottoman Empire - Turkey
      Arab Caliphate - Saudi Arabia
      Spanish duchies - Spain
      Russia - Soviet Union - Russia
      China - People's Republic of China
      Prussia - Germany - West Germany - Germany
      Franks - France
      Greek "polies" - Greece
      Roman Empire - Western Roman Empire - Italian Kingdoms - Italy
      Babylon - Iraq
      Egypt (always so)
      Persia - Iran
      Dehli Sultanate - India
      Japan (always so)
      Mongol Empire - Great Khan's Lands - Mongolia
      Vikings - Sweden - Norway/Sweden - Sweden
      Carthage - Tunisia
      Aztec Empire - Mexico
      Zululand - South African Union - South African Republic
      Korea - South Korea
      England - United Kingdom
      Celts - Ireland
      Iroquis - Canada (probably the most doubtful, but since USA is another civ...)
      USA - at start using the same tech as Iroquis, later changing to it's own (Industrial - Modern ages)

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by notyoueither
        I've been in about 50 MP games through the ancient era. The number of times the Expantionist civ(s) get free settlers and / or large numbers of techs from huts vastly out number the times they do not. Usually they get both.

        Of course, then they could have cows too. Or they could set up a settler pump.
        hi ,

        seconded ; just take a look at the americans , ... take a look at the starting place they get , .....

        as for UU , there are civs that could have two or even three UU's , ..... try the editor and see , its all a matter of balance , .....


        have a nice day
        - RES NON VERBA - DE OPRESSO LIBER - VERITAS ET LIBERTAS - O TOLMON NIKA - SINE PARI - VIGLIA PRETIUM LIBERTAS - SI VIS PACEM , PARA BELLUM -
        - LEGIO PATRIA NOSTRA - one shot , one kill - freedom exists only in a book - everything you always wanted to know about special forces - everything you always wanted to know about Israel - what Dabur does in his free time , ... - in french - “Become an anti-Semitic teacher for 5 Euro only.”
        WHY DOES ISRAEL NEED A SECURITY FENCE --- join in an exceptional demo game > join here forum is now open ! - the new civ Conquest screenshots > go see them UPDATED 07.11.2003 ISRAEL > crisis or challenge ?

        Comment

        Working...
        X