Has anybody here ever played the original version of Civ? The boardgame? There are many many elements of that game that I miss when playing Civ on the PC. Trade sessions and smacking people with calamities particularly. The game was so finely balanced that war was often a really bad idea unless you knew for a fact you could afford to lose the units from the map and not have city revolts at the start of the next turn. Very few people managed to survive starting a war. Border conflicts were another matter, and often settled with a good territory trade or just viewed as a way to kill off excess population. My play style for the PC version is highly influenced by those games, and I still prefer diplomacy to war, and it looks to me like CivIII will still allow that option, even tho they've adjusted the combat AI and units. Anyway, I was just wondering if anyone else played and was influenced by the boardgame. I also often wonder if the PC version developers have played the boardgame.
Lirath
Lirath
) so I never quite had the full experience of trading and all that. It seems to me that CivIII will actually be more similar to the board game than previous Civ computer games, at least in some ways. As you mentioned, Lirath, in the board game all-out war is a really bad idea, and I think CivIII will impose new restrictions that have this effect. The new systems of resources, culture, and advanced diplomacy will make you think twice about going to war. I also think that CivIII will have more of that "everything-I-do-affects-everything-else-a-lot" feeling that the board game had. So overall I think the board game influenced my tendancy to be careful and take everything into consideration; but although CivII didn't really require this, I hope that CivIII will.

Comment